Larson v. Harman-Management Corporation et al
Filing
7
ORDER GRANTING Joint Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference and Corresponding Deadlines. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 5/19/2016, is CONTINUED to 6/28/2016, at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties shall file their joint scheduling report by no later than 6/21/2016. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/20/2016. (Timken, A)
1 TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 222020)
10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192
2 Phoenix, AZ 85028
3 Telephone: (480) 247-9644
Facsimile: (480) 717-4781
4 E-mail: tkent@lemberglaw.com
5
Sergei Lemberg (phv application to follow) (CT Bar. No. 425027)
6
Stephen Taylor (phv application to follow) (CT Bar No. 428505)
7 Lemberg Law LLC
43 Danbury Road
8
Wilton, CT 06897
9 Telephone: (203) 653-2250
Facsimile: (203) 653-3424
10
E-mail: slemberg@lemberglaw.com
11 E-mail: staylor@lemberglaw.com
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
Cory Larson, on behalf of himself and all
15 others similarly situated,
16
Plaintiff,
17
18
vs.
Case No.: 1:16-cv-00219-DAD-SKO
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND
CORRESPONDING DEADLINES
19 Harman-Management Corporation; and
20 3Seventy, Inc.,
21
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER
1
The Court, having reviewed and considered the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to
2 Continue Scheduling Conference and Corresponding Deadlines, and for good cause
3 shown,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED. The Scheduling
5 Conference is continued to June 28, 2016, at 10:15 a.m. The corresponding deadlines
6 are continued in accordance with this new date as provided for in this Court’s February
7 18, 2016, Order (Docket No. 3).
8
9
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
11 Dated:
12
April 20, 2016
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?