Larson v. Harman-Management Corporation et al

Filing 7

ORDER GRANTING Joint Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference and Corresponding Deadlines. The Scheduling Conference currently set for 5/19/2016, is CONTINUED to 6/28/2016, at 10:15 AM in Courtroom 7 (SKO) before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties shall file their joint scheduling report by no later than 6/21/2016. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/20/2016. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 TRINETTE G. KENT (State Bar No. 222020) 10645 North Tatum Blvd., Suite 200-192 2 Phoenix, AZ 85028 3 Telephone: (480) 247-9644 Facsimile: (480) 717-4781 4 E-mail: tkent@lemberglaw.com 5 Sergei Lemberg (phv application to follow) (CT Bar. No. 425027) 6 Stephen Taylor (phv application to follow) (CT Bar No. 428505) 7 Lemberg Law LLC 43 Danbury Road 8 Wilton, CT 06897 9 Telephone: (203) 653-2250 Facsimile: (203) 653-3424 10 E-mail: slemberg@lemberglaw.com 11 E-mail: staylor@lemberglaw.com 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 Cory Larson, on behalf of himself and all 15 others similarly situated, 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 vs. Case No.: 1:16-cv-00219-DAD-SKO ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND CORRESPONDING DEADLINES 19 Harman-Management Corporation; and 20 3Seventy, Inc., 21 Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER 1 The Court, having reviewed and considered the Parties’ Joint Stipulation to 2 Continue Scheduling Conference and Corresponding Deadlines, and for good cause 3 shown, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation is GRANTED. The Scheduling 5 Conference is continued to June 28, 2016, at 10:15 a.m. The corresponding deadlines 6 are continued in accordance with this new date as provided for in this Court’s February 7 18, 2016, Order (Docket No. 3). 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: 12 April 20, 2016 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?