Quiroga v. Graves et al
ORDER DENYING 38 Motion for Issuance of Subpoena, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 04/16/18. (Martin-Gill, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MONICO J. QUIROGA III,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA
(ECF No. 38.)
SERGEANT GRAVES, et al.,
Monico J. Quiroga III (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 19, 2016,
Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s Third Amended
Complaint, filed on March 30, 2018, awaits the court’s requisite screening under 28 U.S.C. §
1915A. (ECF No. 39.)
On March 30, 2018, Plaintiff filed a motion for issuance of a subpoena duces tecum.
(ECF No. 38.)
PLAINTIF’S MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA
Plaintiff requests issuance of a subpoena duces tecum commanding production of
documents and video footage from a non-party, and service of the subpoena by the U.S.
Plaintiff’s motion is denied as discovery has not yet been opened in this case. When the
case is ready for discovery the court will issue a scheduling order opening discovery.
Discovery will not be opened until after the complaint has been served and one or more of the
defendants has filed an answer to the complaint. Therefore, it is not time for discovery in this
case, and Plaintiff’s motion for issuance of a subpoena shall be denied.
Moreover, Plaintiff is advised that when discovery is opened, the court will consider
granting a subpoena seeking documents from a non-party only if the documents sought from the
non-party are not equally available to Plaintiff and are not obtainable from Defendants through
a request for production of documents. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34.
Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for
issuance of a subpoena, filed on March 30. 2018, is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
April 16, 2018
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?