Andersen v. Montes et al
Filing
14
ORDER Adopting 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, and DENYING Plaintiff's 9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and 10 Motion for an Order to Show Cause signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/30/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANDREW S. ANDERSEN,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
MARISELA MONTES et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
No. 1:16-cv-00236-DAD-SAB
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND
MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE
(Doc. Nos. 9, 10, 13)
17
18
19
20
Plaintiff Andrew S. Andersen is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights
21
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
22
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On December 13, 2016, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and
23
24
recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s requests for injunctive relief be denied. (Doc.
25
No. 13.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that
26
objections thereto were to be filed within thirty days. Over thirty days have passed, and no
27
objections have been filed.
28
/////
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the court has conducted a
2
de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings
3
and recommendation to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
4
Accordingly,
5
1. The December 13, 2016 findings and recommendations (Doc. No. 13) are adopted in
6
7
full; and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 9) and motion for an order to
8
show cause why a preliminary injunction should not be issued (Doc. No. 10) are
9
denied without prejudice as premature.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 30, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?