Tennison v. Lawrence Factor, Inc. et al

Filing 14

ORDER GRANTING 13 Stipulation to Continue Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/6/2016. Initial Scheduling Conference CONTINUED to 8/5/2016 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
Westchester Corporate Plaza ● 1800 30th Street, Fourth Floor ● Bakersfield, CA 93301-5298 ● Telephone 661-327-9661 ● Facsimile 661-327-1087 ● http://www.youngwooldridge.com LLP Young Wooldridge, A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP COMPOSED OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS The Law Offices Of 1 The Law Offices Of Young Wooldridge, LLP 2 1800 30th Street, Fourth Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301 3 Telephone: (661) 327-9661 Fax: (661) 327-1087 4 E-mail: gmuir@youngwooldridge.com 5 Greg A. Muir, Esq., SBN 106077 Attorneys for Plaintiff, STEPHANIE TENNISON 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEPHANIE TENNISON, Case No. 1:16-cv-00247-LJO-JLT Plaintiff, 12 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER vs. 13 LAWRENCE FACTOR, INC.; LAB ON 14 LOCALE; X-ZAM LABORATORIES; and DOES 1-25, 15 Defendants. 16 (Doc. 13) 17 LAWRENCE FACTOR, INC., 18 19 Cross-Claimant, vs. 20 HAGEMEYER NORTH AMERICA, and ROES 1-25, 21 Cross-Defendants. 22 23 24 The parties, by and through their attorneys of record herein, hereby stipulate that the 25 Mandatory Scheduling Conference, currently set for June 20, 2016, be continued for 45 days to 26 allow new counsel, Reuben B. Jacobson, Esq., Steven E. Meyer, Esq., and Jeremiah P. Webb, 27 Esq. of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, LLP to formally substitute in as counsel for the 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Westchester Corporate Plaza ● 1800 30th Street, Fourth Floor ● Bakersfield, CA 93301-5298 ● Telephone 661-327-9661 ● Facsimile 661-327-1087 ● http://www.youngwooldridge.com LLP Young Wooldridge, A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP COMPOSED OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS The Law Offices Of 1 defendant Lawrence Factor, Inc. and for cross-claimants and cross-defendants to resolve the 2 cross-claim. This would allow new counsel time to review the case so that the parties can 3 participate in a meaningful meet and confer conference prior to the mandatory scheduling 4 conference. 5 A [Proposed] Order Granting Substitution of Attorney for Lawrence Factors, Inc. is 6 anticipated to be filed with the Court in the next five (5) business days. 7 8 DATED: June 6, 2016 YOUNG WOOLDRIDGE, LLP 9 10 By:___/s/ Greg Muir_________________ Greg A. Muir, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff STEPHANIE TENNISON 11 12 DATED: June 6, 2016 13 BRADLEY & GMELICH 14 15 16 By: 17 18 19 20 /s/ Carol A. Humiston Carole A. Humiston, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants LAWRENCE FACTOR, INC.; LAB ON LOCALE; X-ZAM LABORATORIES and Cross-Claimant LAWRENCE FACTOR, INC., DATED: June 6, 2016 21 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH, LLP 22 23 24 25 26 27 By /s/ Reuben B. Jacobson Reuben B. Jacobsen, Esq. Steven E. Meyer, Esq. Jeremiah P. Webb, Esq. Attorneys for Defendants LAWRENCE FACTOR, INC. 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Westchester Corporate Plaza ● 1800 30th Street, Fourth Floor ● Bakersfield, CA 93301-5298 ● Telephone 661-327-9661 ● Facsimile 661-327-1087 ● http://www.youngwooldridge.com LLP Young Wooldridge, A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP COMPOSED OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS The Law Offices Of 1 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The Mandatory Scheduling Conference, currently set for June 20, 2016, is hereby 3 continued to August 5, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. 4 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 Dated: June 6, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?