Grant v. Coalinga State Hospital, et al.

Filing 10

ORDER SETTING Mandatory Scheduling Conference: Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is set for November 1, 2016 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 9/29/2016. (Herman, H)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

TIFFANI GRANT,

9

Plaintiff,

10
11

Case No. 1:16-CV-00253-LJO-BAM
ORDER SETTING MANDATORY
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

v.
COALINGA STATE HOSPITAL, etal.,

DATE: NOVEMBER 1, 2016
TIME: 9:30 AM

12

Defendants.

13

CTRM: #8 (6th Floor)
BARBARA A. McAULIFFE
U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14
15
16

Rule 16, Fed.R.Civ.P., requires the Court to enter a Scheduling Conference Order within

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

90 days of the date of the Complaint being served upon the defendant. Therefore, it is ordered that
you appear for a formal Scheduling Conference before United States Magistrate Judge Barbara A.
McAuliffe, in Courtroom 8 at the United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA
93721.
The Court is unable to conduct a scheduling conference until the defendant(s)
has/have been served with the summons and complaint. Accordingly, plaintiff(s) shall diligently
pursue service of summons and complaint and dismiss those defendants against whom plaintiff(s)
will not pursue claims. Plaintiff(s) shall promptly file proofs of service of the summons and
complaint so the Court has a record of service. Counsel are referred to Fed.R.Civ.P., Rule 4,
regarding the requirement of timely service of the complaint. Failure to serve summons and
complaint timely may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of unserved
1

1

defendants.

2

Due to the mandates of Rule 16, this Order may be served upon counsel for the

3

plaintiff(s) before appearances of defendant(s) are due. It is the obligation of counsel for the

4

plaintiff(s) to serve a copy of this Order on the defendant(s), or, if identified, on their counsel,

5

promptly upon receipt of this Order, and to file an appropriate proof of such service with the

6

Court, in compliance with Rule 135(a) of the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of

7

California.

8
9

Attendance at the Scheduling Conference is mandatory by each party not
represented by counsel or by retained counsel. Only counsel who are thoroughly familiar with

10

the facts and the law of the instant case, and who have full authority to bind his or her client, shall

11

appear. Trial counsel should participate in this Scheduling Conference whenever possible. It

12

may be necessary for counsel to spend as much as 45 minutes in this Conference.

13

A Joint Scheduling Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel/pro se

14

parties, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling

15

Conference, and shall be e−mailed, in Word format, to [e-mail].

16

For reference purposes, the Court requires that counsels' Joint Scheduling Report

17

indicate the date, time, and courtroom of the Scheduling Conference. This information is to be

18

placed opposite the caption on the first page of the Report. Among other things, counsel will be

19

expected to discuss the possibility of settlement. Counsel are to discuss settlement thoroughly

20

with each other before undertaking the preparation of the Joint Scheduling Report and engaging

21

in extensive discovery. However, even if settlement negotiations are progressing, counsel are

22

expected to comply with the requirements of this Order unless otherwise excused by the Court. If

23

the case is settled, please promptly inform the Court, and counsels' presence, as well as the Joint

24

Scheduling Report, will not be required.

25

Counsel may request that their attendance be by telephonic conference. If

26

two or more parties wish to appear telephonically, counsel shall decide which will be responsible

27

for making prior arrangements for the conference call and shall initiate the call at the

28

above−designated time. After all parties are on the line, the call should then be placed to Judge

1

McAuliffe’s chambers at

2
3

[phone]. Additionally, counsel are directed to indicate on the face page of
their Joint Scheduling Report that the conference will be telephonic.

4

At least twenty (20) days prior to the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, trial

5

counsel for all parties shall conduct and conclude a conference at a time and place arranged by

6

counsel for the plaintiff(s). This conference preferably should be a personal conference between

7

all counsel but, due to the distances involved in this District, a telephonic conference call

8

involving all counsel/pro se parties is permissible. The Joint Scheduling Report shall respond to

9

the following items by corresponding numbered paragraphs:

10

Form and Contents of the Joint Scheduling Report

11

1.

12

Summary of the factual and legal contentions set forth in the pleadings of

each party, including the relief sought by any party presently before the Court.

13

2.

A proposed deadline for amendments to pleadings shall be included. Any

14

proposed amendment to the pleadings presently on file shall be filed by its proponent

15

contemporaneously with the Scheduling Conference Report. If the matter cannot be resolved at

16

the Scheduling Conference, the matter will be set as a Motion to Amend in accordance with the

17

Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California.

18

3.

A summary of the uncontested and contested facts.

19

4.

A summary of the legal issues as to which there is no dispute, e.g.,

20

jurisdiction, venue, applicable federal or state law, etc., as well as summary of the disputed legal

21

issues.

22
23
24
25
26

5.

The status of all matters which are presently set before the Court, e.g.,

hearings of motions, etc.
6.

A complete and detailed discovery plan addressing the following:
a.

A date for the exchange of initial disclosures required by Fed. R.

Civ. P. 26(a)(1) or a statement that disclosures have already been exchanged;

27

b.

A firm cut-off date for non-expert discovery;

28

c.

A firm date for disclosure of expert witnesses as required by Fed.

1

R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2);

2

d.

A firm cut-off date for expert witness discovery;

3

e.

Any proposed changes in the limits on discovery imposed by Fed.

4

R. Civ. P. 26(b); 30(a)(2)(A), (B); 30(d); or 33(a);

5

f.

Whether the parties anticipate the need for a protective order

6

relating to the discovery of information relating to a trade secret or other confidential research,

7

development, or commercial information;

8
9

g.
or scheduling of discovery;

10
11

h.

i.

16

Whether any party anticipates video and/or sound recording of

j.

Whether the parties foresee a need for a Mid-Discovery Status

depositions; and

14
15

Whether the parties anticipate the need to take discovery outside the

United States and, if so, a description of the proposed discovery;

12
13

Any issues or proposals relating to the timing, sequencing, phasing

Report and Conference and, if so, a proposed date for conducting the conference.
7.

Discovery relating to Electronic, Digital and/or Magnetic data. Prior to a

17

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, counsel should carefully investigate their respective client's

18

information management system so that they are knowledgeable as to its operating, including

19

how information is stored and how it can be retrieved. Counsel shall also conduct a reasonable

20

review of their respective client's computer files to ascertain the contents thereof, including

21

archival and legacy data (outdated formats or media), and disclose in initial discovery (self-

22

executing routine discovery) the computer-based evidence which may be used to support claims

23

or defenses. A party seeking discovery of computer-based information shall notify the opposing

24

party immediately, but no later than the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, of that fact and identify

25

as clearly as possible the categories of information which may be sought.

26
27
28

8.

Duty to Meet and Confer. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the

following matters during the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference:
a.

Computer-based information (in general): The parties shall attempt

1

to agree on steps the parties will take to segregate and preserve computer-based information in

2

order to avoid accusations of spoliation.

3

b.

E-mail information: The parties shall attempt to agree as to the

4

scope of e-mail discovery and attempt to agree upon an e-mail search protocol. This should

5

include an agreement regarding inadvertent production of privileged e-mail messages.

6

c.

Deleted information: The parties shall confer and attempt to agree

7

whether or not restoration of deleted information may be necessary, the extent to which

8

restoration of deleted information is needed, and who will bear the costs of restoration; and

9

d.

Back-up data: The parties shall attempt to agree whether or not

10

back-up data may be necessary, the extent to which backup data is needed and who will bear the

11

cost of obtaining back-up data.

12

9.

13

Dates agreed to by all counsel for:
a.

Filing non-dispositive and dispositive pre-trial motions with the

14

understanding that motions (except motions in limine or other trial motions) will not be

15

entertained after the agreed upon date, which shall be no later than 10 weeks prior to the proposed

16

Pre-Trial Conference date.

17
18

b.

prior to the proposed trial date.)

19
20
21
22

Pre-Trial Conference Date. (This date shall be no later than 45 days

c.

Trial date.

All of these dates should be considered firm dates. Dates should be set to allow
the court to decide any matters under submission before the Pre-Trial Conference is set.
10.

At the conference referred to above, counsel are encouraged to discuss

23

settlement, and the Court will expect a statement in the Joint Scheduling Report as to the

24

possibility of settlement. The parties shall indicate when they desire a settlement conference, e.g.,

25

before further discovery, after discovery, after pre-trial motions, etc.

26

11.

A statement as to whether the case is a jury or non-jury case. If the parties

27

disagree as to whether a jury trial has been timely demanded or whether one is available on some

28

or all of the claims, the statement shall include a summary of each party's position.

1

12.

An estimate of the number of trial days is required. If the parties cannot

2

agree, each party shall give his or her best estimate. In estimating the number of trial days, the

3

parties should keep in mind that this court is normally able to devote the entire day to trial.

4
5

13.

other suggestion for shortening or expediting discovery, pre-trial motions or trial.

6
7

14.

Whether this matter is related to any matter pending in this court or any

other court, including bankruptcy court.

8
9

Whether either party requests bifurcation or phasing of trial or has any

15.

Joint Scheduling Reports are to be e-mailed, in Word format, to

[e-mail].

10
11
Important Chambers' Information
12
The parties are directed to the courtroom calendar on the court's website at
13
www.caed.uscourts.gov for specific information regarding Chambers' procedures. Select
14

“McAuliffe” from the pull down menu and then click on "More Calendaring Information."

15
Information about law and motion, scheduling conferences, telephonic appearances, and
16
discovery disputes is provided at this link.
17
Should counsel or a party appearing pro se fail to appear at the Mandatory
18
Scheduling Conference, or fail to comply with the directions as set forth above, an ex parte
19
hearing may be held and judgment of dismissal, default, or other appropriate judgment
20
may be entered, or sanctions, including contempt of court, may be imposed and/or ordered.
21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated:

September 29, 2016

/s/ Barbara

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE