Hall v. Frauenheim et al

Filing 11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO FOLLOW COURT ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/8/2016. Show Cause Response due by 8/10/2016.(Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

RICHARD B. HALL,

11

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO FOLLOW COURT ORDER
AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

FRAUENHEIM, et al.,

14

Case No. 1:16-cv-00263 AWI DLB

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
15
16

Plaintiff Richard B. Hall (“Plaintiff”), a state inmate in the custody of the California

17 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), is proceeding pro se and in forma
18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on
19 February 25, 2016.
20

On May 18, 2016, the Court screened the complaint and dismissed it with leave to amend.

21 Pursuant to that order, an amended complaint was due within thirty (30) days. Over thirty (30)
22 days have passed and he has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise contacted the Court.
23

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why this action

24 should not be dismissed for failure to follow a Court order and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff must
25 file a response to this order within thirty (30) days. Plaintiff may also comply by filing an
26 amended complaint pursuant to the May 18, 2016, order.
27 ///
28 ///

1

Failure to follow this order will result in dismissal of this action.

2
3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Dennis

July 8, 2016

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2