Owens v. Bakersfield Holdings, LLC et al

Filing 9

STIPULATION and ORDER 8 Continuing Mandatory Scheduling Conference, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 4/20/2016. Initial Scheduling Conference CONTINUED to 6/20/2016 at 10:00 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Joint report due seven days prior to conference. Defendants' responsive pleadings due by 5/27/2016. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5

Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff
Arthur Owens

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ARTHUR OWENS,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiff,
vs.
BAKERSFIELD HOLDINGS, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 1:16-cv-00275-AWI-JLT
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF
MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
(Doc. 9)

WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action is currently set for April
28, 2016, pursuant to the Court’s Order dated February 29, 2016 (Dkt. 4);

20

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, Arthur Owens (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants, Bakersfield

21

Holdings, LLC and Elias Kostianis dba Sugar Mill (“Defendants,” and together with Plaintiff,

22

“the Parties”) previously stipulated to an extension of time for Defendants responsive pleadings

23

such that the responsive pleadings were due on April 15, 2016;

24

WHEREAS, the Parties are engaging in settlement discussions and wish to exhaust such

25

efforts before incurring the fees and costs associated with responsive pleadings and the

26

Scheduling Conference, and to conserve Court resources;

27

NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendant Bakersfield Holdings, LLC, by and

28

through their respective counsel, and Defendant Elias Kostianis dba Sugar Mill, who is
STIPULATION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND
CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1

1

currently unrepresented and is specially appearing on his own behalf for the sole purpose of this

2

stipulation, stipulate to a six-week continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference

3

currently set for April 28, 2016 to a date at the Court’s convenience after June 9, 2016, and to a

4

further extension of time for Defendants’ responsive pleadings such that they be due on May

5

27, 2016.

6
7

Dated: April 20, 2016

MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.

8
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Arthur Owens

9
10
11
12

Dated: April 16, 2016

13

VICTORY LAW GROUP, LLP
/s/ Erik S. Velie
Erik S. Velie
Attorney for Defendant,
Bakersfield Holdings, LLC

14
15
16
17
18
19

Dated: April 19, 2016

/s/ Elias Kostianis
Defendant,
Elias Kostianis dba Sugar Mill

20
21
22
23
24
25

I attest that the signatures of the persons whose electronic signatures are shown above are
maintained by me, and that their concurrence in the filing of this document and attribution of
their signatures was obtained.
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff,
Arthur Owens

26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND
CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2

ORDER

1
2

The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for

4

April 28, 2016 is continued to June 20, 2016 at 10:00 a.m before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L.

5

Thurston. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven days prior to

6

the conference.

7
8

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file their responsive pleadings on or
before May 27, 2016.

9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

11
Dated:
12

April 20, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS AND
CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 3