Calderon v. Foulks

Filing 18

ORDER Staying Proceedings signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 08/16/2016. (Flores, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUIS CALDERON, Case No. 1:16-cv-00276-LJO-SAB-HC Petitioner, 12 ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS v. 13 14 FREDERIC FOULKS, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner, represented by counsel, proceeding with a petition for writ 18 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 19, 2016, the Court granted Petitioner’s 19 motion to stay the proceedings pursuant to Kelly v. Small, 315 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2002). (ECF 20 No. 16). On August 15, 2016, Petitioner filed an amended petition containing only exhausted 21 claims, which satisfies the first requirement for a Kelly stay. (ECF No. 17). 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. The proceedings are STAYED pending exhaustion of state remedies; and 24 2. Petitioner is DIRECTED to file a status report within thirty (30) days of the date of 25 service of this order, and then every ninety (90) days thereafter. Within thirty (30) 26 days following the final order of the state courts, Petitioner MUST FILE an amended 27 petition in this Court including all exhausted claims. 28 /// 1 1 Petitioner is forewarned that failure to comply with this order will result in the Court 2 vacating the stay. IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ August 16, 2016 UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?