Calderon v. Foulks

Filing 21

ORDER DISCHARGING 19 Order to Show Cause; ORDER DIRECTING Petitioner to File State Habeas Petition signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/11/2016. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUIS CALDERON, Petitioner, 12 ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (ECF No. 19) v. 13 14 Case No. 1:16-cv-00276-LJO-SAB-HC ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE STATE HABEAS PETITION FREDERIC FOULKS, 15 Respondent. 16 17 On August 16, 2016, the Court stayed the instant proceedings and ordered Petitioner to 18 file a status report within thirty days. (ECF No. 18). Petitioner failed to file a status report within 19 the allotted time period. Therefore, on September 29, 2016, the Court issued an order to show 20 cause why the stay should not be vacated for failing to obey a court order. (ECF No. 19). 21 On October 6, 2016, Petitioner filed a response, indicating that Petitioner’s counsel was 22 diagnosed with a serious medical condition last year and has undergone numerous procedures. 23 (ECF No. 20). Petitioner also informed the court that the state habeas petition “is in final draft 24 and ready to be filed in state court,” but to date has not been filed in Tulare County Superior 25 Court. 26 In light of Petitioner’s response, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The order to show cause issued on September 29, 2016 (ECF No. 19) is 28 DISCHARGED; 1 2. Petitioner is DIRECTED to file the state habeas petition in the Tulare County 1 Superior Court within FOURTEEN (14) days of the date of service of this order; and 2 3 3. Petitioner is DIRECTED to file a status report within NINETY (90) days of the date 4 of service of this order, and then every NINETY (90) days thereafter, in accordance 5 with the Court’s previous order (ECF No. 18). 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 Dated: October 11, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?