Owens v. Interstate Management Company LLC et al

Filing 9

sECOND STIPULATION for Extension of Time for All Defendants to Respond to Complaint and to Continue Scheduling Conference; ORDER: that Defendants, Interstate Management Company LLC dba Residence Inn by Marriott and BRE Newton Hotels Property Owner L LC, shall have to and including June 17, 2016 within which to file a responsive pleading. Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued from 6/1/2016 to July 28, 2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/17/2016. (Herman, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff Arthur Owens 6 7 8 9 10 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Kristina M. Launey (SBN 221335) 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350 Sacramento, California 95814-4428 Telephone: (916) 448-0159 Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 E-mail: klauney@seyfarth.com 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendants (Specially Appearing) Interstate Management Company LLC Dba Residence Inn by Marriott, et al. BRE Newton Hotels Property Owner LLC 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ARTHUR OWENS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY ) LLC dba RESIDENCE INN BY MARRIOTT, ) ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) No. 1:16-cv-00305-LJO-BAM SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ALL DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ; [PROPOSED] ORDER 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME AND TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 1 26999205v.1 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Arthur Owens, by and 2 through his counsel of record, and Defendants Interstate Management Company LLC dba 3 Residence Inn by Marriott and BRE Newton Hotels Property Owner LLC (collectively 4 “Defendants”), by and through their attorney who is specially appearing on their behalves, that 5 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a) and Local Rule 144(a), Defendants may have 6 to and including June 17, 2016 to file a responsive pleading in this matter. This extension of 7 time is Defendants’ second extension and is requested because Defendants are currently 8 engaging counsel to represent them in this matter, and to allow the parties time to discuss 9 resolution of this matter prior to engaging in litigation. 10 THE PARTIES FURTHER STIPULATE AND REQUEST that the Court therefore 11 also continue the Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for June 1, 2016, to a date at the 12 Court’s convenience on or after June 30, 2016. 13 14 Date: May 16, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 15 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff Arthur Owens 16 17 18 19 20 Date: May 16, 2016 INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY LLC DBA RESIDENCE INN BY MARRIOTT and BRE NEWTON HOTELS PROPERTY OWNER LLC 21 22 23 /s/ Kristina M. Launey By: Kristina M. Launey Seyfarth Shaw LLP Specially appearing for Defendants 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME AND TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 2 26999205v.1 1 ORDER 2 The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants, Interstate Management Company LLC 4 dba Residence Inn by Marriott and BRE Newton Hotels Property Owner LLC, shall have to and 5 including June 17, 2016 within which to file a responsive pleading. 6 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for June 1, 2016, is continued to July 28, 2016 at 9:00 AM, 2016 before Judge McAuliffe. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 17, 2016 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME AND TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER Page 3 26999205v.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?