Owens v. Interstate Management Company LLC et al
Filing
9
sECOND STIPULATION for Extension of Time for All Defendants to Respond to Complaint and to Continue Scheduling Conference; ORDER: that Defendants, Interstate Management Company LLC dba Residence Inn by Marriott and BRE Newton Hotels Property Owner L LC, shall have to and including June 17, 2016 within which to file a responsive pleading. Initial SCHEDULING CONFERENCE is continued from 6/1/2016 to July 28, 2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (BAM) before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe. signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/17/2016. (Herman, H)
1
2
3
4
5
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: tanya@moorelawfirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Arthur Owens
6
7
8
9
10
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Kristina M. Launey (SBN 221335)
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350
Sacramento, California 95814-4428
Telephone: (916) 448-0159
Facsimile: (916) 558-4839
E-mail: klauney@seyfarth.com
11
12
13
Attorneys for Defendants (Specially Appearing)
Interstate Management Company LLC
Dba Residence Inn by Marriott, et al.
BRE Newton Hotels Property Owner LLC
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ARTHUR OWENS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
)
vs.
)
INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY )
LLC dba RESIDENCE INN BY MARRIOTT, )
)
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
No. 1:16-cv-00305-LJO-BAM
SECOND STIPULATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ALL
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME AND TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 1
26999205v.1
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Arthur Owens, by and
2
through his counsel of record, and Defendants Interstate Management Company LLC dba
3
Residence Inn by Marriott and BRE Newton Hotels Property Owner LLC (collectively
4
“Defendants”), by and through their attorney who is specially appearing on their behalves, that
5
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(a) and Local Rule 144(a), Defendants may have
6
to and including June 17, 2016 to file a responsive pleading in this matter. This extension of
7
time is Defendants’ second extension and is requested because Defendants are currently
8
engaging counsel to represent them in this matter, and to allow the parties time to discuss
9
resolution of this matter prior to engaging in litigation.
10
THE PARTIES FURTHER STIPULATE AND REQUEST that the Court therefore
11
also continue the Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for June 1, 2016, to a date at the
12
Court’s convenience on or after June 30, 2016.
13
14
Date: May 16, 2016
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
15
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff
Arthur Owens
16
17
18
19
20
Date: May 16, 2016
INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT
COMPANY LLC DBA RESIDENCE INN
BY MARRIOTT and BRE NEWTON
HOTELS PROPERTY OWNER LLC
21
22
23
/s/ Kristina M. Launey
By: Kristina M. Launey
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Specially appearing for Defendants
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME AND TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 2
26999205v.1
1
ORDER
2
The Parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants, Interstate Management Company LLC
4
dba Residence Inn by Marriott and BRE Newton Hotels Property Owner LLC, shall have to and
5
including June 17, 2016 within which to file a responsive pleading.
6
7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference currently scheduled for
June 1, 2016, is continued to July 28, 2016 at 9:00 AM, 2016 before Judge McAuliffe.
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 17, 2016
/s/ Barbara
A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME AND TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Page 3
26999205v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?