North Coast Rivers Alliance, et al. v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.

Filing 186

STIPULATION ACCEPTING ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND PLAINTIFFS' THIRD AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ON ENUMERATED DEFENDANTS AND EXTENDING BY 60 DAYS THEIR TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/16/2022. (Kusamura, W)

Download PDF
STEPHAN C. VOLKER (CSB #63093) 1 ALEXIS E. KRIEG (CSB #254548) STEPHANIE L. CLARKE (CSB #257961) 2 JAMEY M.B. VOLKER (CSB #273544) LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. VOLKER 3 1633 University Avenue Berkeley, California 94703 510/496-0600 Fax: 510/845-1255 4 Tel: 5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 6 NORTH COAST RIVERS ALLIANCE, CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, PACIFIC 7 COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN’S ASSOCIATIONS, SAN FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT 8 OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., and INSTITUTE 9 FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 FRESNO DIVISION 13 14 NORTH COAST RIVERS ALLIANCE, Civ. No. 16-cv-307-DAD-SKO PROTECTION ALLIANCE, PACIFIC STIPULATION ACCEPTING ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ON ENUMERATED DEFENDANTS AND EXTENDING BY 60 DAYS THEIR TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING 15 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING 16 COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN’S ASSOCIATIONS, SAN 17 FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., and INSTITUTE 18 FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES, 19 20 Plaintiffs, v. 21 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AND THE INTERIOR, and UNITED STATES 22 BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, ORDER THEREON 23 (Doc. 184) Defendants, 24 WESTLANDS WATER DISTRICT, SAN Judge Dale A. Drozd LUIS WATER DISTRICT, and PANOCHE 25 WATER DISTRICT, 26 Intervenor-Defendants. 27 28 Stip. and Order for Electronic Service and Extending Time to Respond; Order Case No. 16–cv-307-DAD-SKO 1 Pursuant to Local Rule 144, Plaintiffs North Coast Rivers Alliance, California 2 Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, 3 San Francisco Crab Boat Owners Association, Inc., and Institute for Fisheries Resources 4 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendants 4-M Water District, Bella Vista Water District, 5 Centerville Community Services District, City of Shasta Lake, Clear Creek Community 6 Services District, Colusa County Water District, Corning Water District, Cortina Water 7 District, County of Colusa, Davis Water District, Dunnigan Water District, Glenn Valley 8 Water District, Glide Water District, Holthouse Water District, Kanawha Water District, 9 LaGrande Water District, Mountain Gate Community Services District, Myers-Marsh 10 Mutual Water Company, Proberta Water District, Sacramento Municipal Utility District, 11 and Shasta Community Services District (collectively, “Enumerated Defendants”) by and 12 through undersigned counsel, do jointly stipulate that Enumerated Defendants have 13 accepted electronic service of the Summons and Plaintiffs’ Third Amended and 14 Supplemental Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (“TASC”) as of January 31, 15 2022, and that the deadline for Enumerated Defendants to file their pleadings responsive to 16 the TASC is extended by 60 days to April 22, 2022. In support of this Stipulation and its 17 requested extension, Plaintiffs and Enumerated Defendants state as follows: 18 1. Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint for 19 Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (“TASC”) with the Court on December 1, 2021. Dkt. 20 No. 156. The TASC added new defendant parties to the litigation, including Enumerated 21 Defendants. The civil Summonses were issued to Enumerated Defendants on December 3, 22 2021. Dkt. Nos. 157-168. 23 2. On January 31, 2022, counsel for Plaintiffs requested that Enumerated 24 Defendants waive personal service of the Summons and TASC and accept electronic 25 service through their counsel of record. The Enumerated Defendants agreed to accept 26 electronic service of the Summons and the TASC in exchange for Plaintiffs’ agreement to 27 28 Stip. and Order for Electronic Service and Extending Time to Respond; Order Case No. 16–cv-307-DAD-SKO 1 extend by 60 days the time for Enumerated Defendants to file pleadings responsive to the 2 TASC. 3 3. Accordingly, Plaintiffs and Enumerated Defendants hereby agree that 4 Enumerated Defendants were served with the Summons and the TASC as on January 31, 5 2022, and that the deadline for Enumerated Defendants to file their pleadings responsive to 6 the TASC is extended by 60 days from February 21, 2022 to April 22, 2022. 7 4. The Enumerated Defendants and each of them shall have to April 22, 2022, 8 to file an answer or to otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ TASC. 9 10 Respectfully submitted, 11 DATED: March 4, 2022 12 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN VOLKER 13 14 By: /s/ Stephan C. Volker STEPHAN C. VOLKER Attorneys for Plaintiffs 15 16 17 DATED: March 14, 2022 DOWNEY BRAND LLP 18 19 By: /s/ Rebecca Smith REBECCA SMITH Attorneys for Enumerated Defendants 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. and Order for Electronic Service and Extending Time to Respond; Order Case No. 16–cv-307-DAD-SKO 1 ORDER 2 3 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING from the Parties’ above Stipulation (Doc. 184), 4 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 5 1. THE ABOVE ENUMERATED DEFENDANTS WERE SERVED WITH THE SUMMONS AND PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL 6 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF (“TASC”) ON JANUARY 31, 2022; and 7 2. THE DEADLINE FOR THE ABOVE ENUMERATED DEFENDANTS TO 8 FILE THEIR PLEADINGS RESPONSIVE TO PLAINTIFFS’ TASC IS EXTENDED BY 9 60 DAYS TO APRIL 22, 2022. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: March 16, 2022 12 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stip. and Order for Electronic Service and Extending Time to Respond; Order Case No. 16–cv-307-DAD-SKO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?