Cramer v. Coney et al

Filing 6

ORDER DENYING 5 Motion for Order in Closed Action, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 03/21/2016. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MATTHEW B. CRAMER,

12
13

Plaintiff,
v.

14

CAROL L. CONEY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00321-LJO-BAM
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR ORDER IN
CLOSED ACTION
(Doc. 5)

Plaintiff Matthew B. Cramer (“Plaintiff”), a pre-trial detainee, proceeded pro se in this civil

18

action. On March 14, 2016, the Court found Plaintiff subject to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), denied

19

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, dismissed this action without prejudice to refiling

20

with the submission of the $400.00 filing fee in full, and closed this case. (Doc. 3). However, on

21

March 18, 2016, Plaintiff filed the instant motion for a court order informing Tulare County Sheriff’s

22

custody staff of his pro per status. (Doc. 5). As this action was dismissed and closed, Plaintiff’s

23

motion shall not be heard and is HEREBY DENIED.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated:

/s/ Barbara

March 21, 2016

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1