Bryant v. Prime Properties et al

Filing 12

STIPULATION and ORDER to continue the Scheduling Conference from 5/27/2016 to 8/30/2016 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/19/2016. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 North Second Street San Jose, California 95112 Telephone (408) 298-2000 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Email: service@moorelawfirm.com Attorney for Plaintiff Rachel Bryant 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 RACHEL BRYANT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) PRIME PROPERTIES, a General Partnership; ) F & H PIZZA INC. dba LITTLE CAESAR’S ) PIZZA; HURLEY ENTERPRISES, LLC dba ) ) D’s WASH & DRY, ) ) ) Defendants. ) No. 1:16-cv-00323-DAD-SAB STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADINGS; ORDER 19 WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action is currently set for May 20 27, 2016, pursuant to the Court’s Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference dated March 21 9, 2016 (Dkt. 3); 22 WHEREAS, on May 2, 2016, Plaintiff Rachel Bryant (“Plaintiff”) filed a First Amended 23 Complaint (Dkt. 8) and served the First Amended Complaint on Defendants Prime Properties, a 24 General Partnership (“Prime Properties”) and F & H Pizza Inc. dba Little Caesar’s Pizza 25 (“Little Caesar,” and together with Plaintiff and Prime Properties, “the Parties”) by mail that 26 same date, as set forth on the Certificate of Service filed with the Court (Dkt. 9); 27 28 WHEREAS, Prime Properties’ and Little Caesar’s responsive pleadings are accordingly due on May 19, 2016; 1 WHEREAS, Plaintiff has been unable to effect service of the summons and First 2 Amended Complaint to date on the remaining defendant, Hurley Enterprises, LLC dba D’s 3 Wash & Dry (“Hurley Enterprises”), but is continuing to make a diligent effort at effecting 4 service; 5 WHEREAS, the Parties have been engaging in settlement discussions and are 6 optimistically hopeful that an informal settlement can be reached, but believe that Hurley 7 Enterprises’ participation is necessary to achieve a full settlement or resolution of Plaintiff’s 8 claims; 9 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to a 10 continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for May 27, 2016 to a date 11 at the Court’s convenience after August 19, 2016, to allow time for Hurley Enterprises to be 12 served with the summons and First Amended Complaint and to make an appearance, and for the 13 Parties to meet and confer with Hurley Enterprises and file a joint scheduling report. The 14 Parties additionally stipulate to an extension of time for Prime Properties’ and Little Caesar’s 15 responsive pleadings, such that the responsive pleadings shall be filed on or before July 22, 16 2016. 17 Date: May 19, 2016 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 18 /s/ Tanya E. Moore Tanya E. Moore Attorney for Plaintiff, Rachel Bryant 19 20 21 Date: May 19, 2016 22 /s/ Ryan M. McNamara Ryan M. McNamara Attorney for Defendant, Prime Properties 23 24 25 CALL & JENSEN A Professional Corporation Date: May 19, 2016 MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP 26 27 28 /s/ Melissa Wood Melissa Wood Attorney for Defendant F & H Pizza, Inc. dba Little Caesar’s Pizza 1 ORDER 2 The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for 4 May 27, 2016 is continued to August 30, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9, before Magistrate 5 Judge Stanley A. Boone. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven 6 days prior to the Conference. Additionally, the time within which Defendants Prime Properties, 7 a General Partnership, and F & H Pizza Inc. dba Little Caesar’s Pizza must file responsive 8 pleadings is extended to and including July 22, 2016. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 19, 2016 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?