Bryant v. Prime Properties et al
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER to continue the Scheduling Conference from 5/27/2016 to 8/30/2016 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9 (SAB) before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/19/2016. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, California 95112
Telephone (408) 298-2000
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Email: service@moorelawfirm.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
Rachel Bryant
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
RACHEL BRYANT,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PRIME PROPERTIES, a General Partnership; )
F & H PIZZA INC. dba LITTLE CAESAR’S )
PIZZA; HURLEY ENTERPRISES, LLC dba )
)
D’s WASH & DRY,
)
)
)
Defendants.
)
No. 1:16-cv-00323-DAD-SAB
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE OF
MANDATORY SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE AND FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE
PLEADINGS; ORDER
19
WHEREAS, a Mandatory Scheduling Conference in this action is currently set for May
20
27, 2016, pursuant to the Court’s Order Setting Mandatory Scheduling Conference dated March
21
9, 2016 (Dkt. 3);
22
WHEREAS, on May 2, 2016, Plaintiff Rachel Bryant (“Plaintiff”) filed a First Amended
23
Complaint (Dkt. 8) and served the First Amended Complaint on Defendants Prime Properties, a
24
General Partnership (“Prime Properties”) and F & H Pizza Inc. dba Little Caesar’s Pizza
25
(“Little Caesar,” and together with Plaintiff and Prime Properties, “the Parties”) by mail that
26
same date, as set forth on the Certificate of Service filed with the Court (Dkt. 9);
27
28
WHEREAS, Prime Properties’ and Little Caesar’s responsive pleadings are accordingly
due on May 19, 2016;
1
WHEREAS, Plaintiff has been unable to effect service of the summons and First
2
Amended Complaint to date on the remaining defendant, Hurley Enterprises, LLC dba D’s
3
Wash & Dry (“Hurley Enterprises”), but is continuing to make a diligent effort at effecting
4
service;
5
WHEREAS, the Parties have been engaging in settlement discussions and are
6
optimistically hopeful that an informal settlement can be reached, but believe that Hurley
7
Enterprises’ participation is necessary to achieve a full settlement or resolution of Plaintiff’s
8
claims;
9
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to a
10
continuance of the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for May 27, 2016 to a date
11
at the Court’s convenience after August 19, 2016, to allow time for Hurley Enterprises to be
12
served with the summons and First Amended Complaint and to make an appearance, and for the
13
Parties to meet and confer with Hurley Enterprises and file a joint scheduling report. The
14
Parties additionally stipulate to an extension of time for Prime Properties’ and Little Caesar’s
15
responsive pleadings, such that the responsive pleadings shall be filed on or before July 22,
16
2016.
17
Date: May 19, 2016
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
18
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff, Rachel Bryant
19
20
21
Date: May 19, 2016
22
/s/ Ryan M. McNamara
Ryan M. McNamara
Attorney for Defendant, Prime Properties
23
24
25
CALL & JENSEN
A Professional Corporation
Date: May 19, 2016
MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP
26
27
28
/s/ Melissa Wood
Melissa Wood
Attorney for Defendant
F & H Pizza, Inc. dba Little Caesar’s Pizza
1
ORDER
2
The parties having so stipulated and good cause appearing,
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Mandatory Scheduling Conference currently set for
4
May 27, 2016 is continued to August 30, 2016 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9, before Magistrate
5
Judge Stanley A. Boone. The parties are to file their Joint Scheduling Report no later than seven
6
days prior to the Conference. Additionally, the time within which Defendants Prime Properties,
7
a General Partnership, and F & H Pizza Inc. dba Little Caesar’s Pizza must file responsive
8
pleadings is extended to and including July 22, 2016.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
May 19, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?