Bryant v. Prime Properties et al

Filing 17

ORDER Entering Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff and Against Defendant F&H Pizza Inc., dba Little Caesar's Pizza signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/1/2016. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RACHEL BRYANT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 No. 1:16-cv-00323-DAD-SAB v. PRIME PROPERTIES, a general partnership; F & H PIZZA INC., d/b/a LITTLE CAESAR’S PIZZA; HURLEY ENTERPRISES, LLC, d/b/a D’s WASH & DRY, 17 ORDER ENTERING JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT F & H PIZZA INC., d/b/a LITTLE CAESAR’S PIZZA (Doc. No. 14) Defendants. 18 On June 23, 2016, plaintiff filed a notice of acceptance of defendant F & H Pizza Inc., 19 20 d/b/a Little Caesar’s Pizza’s offer of judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68(a). 21 (Doc. No. 14.) Plaintiff attached as an exhibit to this notice defendant F & H Pizza Inc.’s offer of 22 judgment. (Doc. No. 14-1.) The offer obligated defendant F & H Pizza Inc. to pay plaintiff 23 $4,450 to resolve any liability claimed in the action, including all costs of suit and attorneys’ fees. 24 (Id.) The offer of judgment was served on plaintiff on June 20, 2016. (Doc. No. 14-1, at 4.) The 25 acceptance of the offer was served on defendant F & H Pizza Inc. on June 23, 2016. (Doc. No. 26 14-2.) No trial date is currently scheduled in this action. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 Rule 68(a) states, in relevant part: 2 At least 14 days before the date set for trial, a party defending against a claim may serve on an opposing party an offer to allow judgment on specified terms, with the costs then accrued. If, within 14 days after being served, the opposing party serves written notice accepting the offer, either party may then file the offer and notice of acceptance, plus proof of service. The clerk must then enter judgment. 3 4 5 6 It is widely accepted that “[t]he [Rule 68] offer, once made, is non-negotiable; it is either 7 accepted, in which case it is automatically entered by the clerk of court, or rejected, in which case 8 it stands as the marker by which the plaintiff’s results are ultimately measured.” Nusom v. Comh 9 Woodburn, Inc., 122 F.3d 830, 834 (9th Cir. 1997). 10 In this matter the Rule 68 offer was made at least fourteen days before the trial date and 11 the offer was accepted within fourteen days of service. Plaintiff has since filed the offer and 12 notice of acceptance as well as a proof of service with the court. Accordingly, because the 13 procedural requirements of Rule 68 have been met: 14 1) The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against defendant F & H Pizza Inc., d/b/a Little Caesar’s Pizza; and 15 16 2) Defendant F & H Pizza Inc., d/b/a Little Caesar’s Pizza is dismissed from this action as a 17 18 19 result of the judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 1, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?