Duke v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
14
ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Show Cause why this Action Should not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute-SEVEN DAY DEADLINE signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 2/23/2017: It is hereby ordered that Plaintiff shall file a written response to this order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute within seven (7) days of the date of service of this order. Failure to comply with this order to show cause shall result in this action being dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Valdez, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LORNA LYNN DUKE,
12
Plaintiff,
v.
13
14
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Case No. 1:16-cv-00333-SAB
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT
BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE
SEVEN DAY DEADLINE
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
On March 9, 2016, Plaintiff filed the present action in this court seeking review of the
19 Commissioner’s denial of an application for benefits. The scheduling order issued on March 11,
20 2016. On December 29, 2016, an order issued granting the parties stipulation to amend the
21 scheduling order. Plaintiff’s opening brief was to be filed on or before February 21, 2017.
22 Plaintiff did not file an opening brief in compliance with the December 29, 2016 order.
23
Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these
24 Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all
25 sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to
26 control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate,
27 including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir.
28 2000).
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a written response to
1
2 this order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute within
3 seven (7) days of the date of service of this order. Failure to comply with this order to show
4 cause shall result in this action being dismissed for failure to prosecute.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 Dated:
February 23, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?