Lopez v. Bans

Filing 32

SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 12/28/2016. Consent/Decline Deadline 1/9/2017. Pleading Amendment Deadline 2/27/2017. Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures 1/31/2017; Non-Expert 9/29/2017; Expert 12/8/2017. Mid-Discovery Status Conference set for 6/23/2017 at 08:30 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filed by 12/18/2017; Hearing by 1/16/2018. Dispositive Motion De adlines: Filed by 2/5/2018; Hearing by 3/6/2018. Settlement Conference set for 3/23/2018 at 09:00 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. Pretrial Conference set for 4/16/2018 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Jury Trial set for 6/12/2018 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 5 (DAD) before District Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 EDUBIGES LOPEZ, Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 MARTIN BANS, 14 15 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-00340 DAD JLT SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16) Pleading Amendment Deadline: 2/27/2017 Discovery Deadlines: Initial Disclosures: 1/31/2017 Non-Expert: 9/29/2017 Expert: 12/8/2017 Mid-Discovery Status Conference: 6/23/2017 at 8:30 a.m. 16 17 Non-Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filing: 12/18/2017 Hearing: 1/16/2018 18 19 Dispositive Motion Deadlines: Filing: 2/5/2018 Hearing: 3/6/2018 20 21 22 Settlement Conference: 3/23/2018, 9:00 a.m. 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA 23 24 26 Pre-Trial Conference: 4/16/2018 at 2:30 p.m. Courtroom 5 27 Trial: 25 28 1 6/12/2018 at 8:30 a.m. Courtroom 5 Jury trial: 4 days 1 I. Magistrate Judge Consent: 2 Notice of Congested Docket and Court Policy of Trailing 3 Due to the District Judges’ heavy caseload, the newly adopted policy of the Fresno Division of 4 the Eastern District is to trail all civil cases. The parties are hereby notified that for a trial date set 5 before a District Judge, the parties will trail indefinitely behind any higher priority criminal or older 6 civil case set on the same date until a courtroom becomes available. The trial date will not be reset to a 7 continued date. The Magistrate Judges’ availability is far more realistic and accommodating to parties than that 8 9 of the U.S. District Judges who carry the heaviest caseloads in the nation and who must prioritize 10 criminal and older civil cases over more recently filed civil cases. A United States Magistrate Judge 11 may conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of 12 Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States 13 Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit. The Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California, whenever possible, is utilizing United 14 15 States Article III District Court Judges from throughout the nation as Visiting Judges. Pursuant to the 16 Local Rules, Appendix A, such reassignments will be random, and the parties will receive no advance 17 notice before their case is reassigned to an Article III District Court Judge from outside of the Eastern 18 District of California. Therefore, the defendant is directed to consider consenting to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction to 19 20 conduct all further proceedings, including trial.1 Within 10 days of the date of this order, counsel 21 SHALL file a consent/decline form (provided by the Court at the inception of this case) indicating 22 whether they will consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. 23 II. Pleading Amendment Deadline Any requested pleading amendments are ordered to be filed, either through a stipulation or 24 25 motion to amend, no later than February 27, 2017. Any motion to amend the pleading SHALL be set 26 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States District Court Judge. 27 /// 28 1 The plaintiff has indicated her willingness to consent in the joint scheduling conference report. (Doc. 30 at 8) 2 1 III. The parties are ordered to exchange the initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) 2 3 on or before January 31, 2017. The parties are ordered to complete all discovery pertaining to non-experts on or before 4 5 Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Date September 29, 2017, and all discovery pertaining to experts on or before December 8, 2017. The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before October 13, 6 7 2017, and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before November 10, 2017. The written designation of 8 retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26(a)(2), (A), (B), 9 and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in 10 compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence offered 11 through such experts that are not disclosed pursuant to this order. The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to experts 12 13 and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and opinions 14 included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, which may 15 include striking the expert designation and preclusion of expert testimony. The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement 16 17 disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced. A mid-discovery status conference is scheduled for June 23, 2017 at 8:30 a.m. before the 18 19 Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, U.S. Magistrate Judge, located at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, 20 California. Counsel SHALL file a joint mid-discovery status conference report one week before the 21 conference. Counsel also SHALL lodge the status report via e-mail to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov. 22 The joint statement SHALL outline the discovery counsel have completed and that which needs to be 23 completed as well as any impediments to completing the discovery within the deadlines set forth in this 24 order. Counsel may appear via CourtCall. 25 IV. 26 Pre-Trial Motion Schedule All non-dispositive pre-trial motions, including any discovery motions, shall be filed no later 27 than December 18, 2017, and heard on or before January 16, 2018. Non-dispositive motions are 28 heard before the Honorable Jennifer L. Thurston, United States Magistrate Judge at the United States 3 1 Courthouse in Bakersfield, California. No motion to amend or stipulation to amend the case schedule will be entertained unless it 2 3 is filed at least one week before the first deadline the parties wish to extend. Likewise, no written 4 discovery motions shall be filed without the prior approval of the assigned Magistrate Judge. A party 5 with a discovery dispute must first confer with the opposing party in a good faith effort to resolve by 6 agreement the issues in dispute. If that good faith effort is unsuccessful, the moving party promptly 7 shall seek a telephonic hearing with all involved parties and the Magistrate Judge. It shall be the 8 obligation of the moving party to arrange and originate the conference call to the court. To schedule 9 this telephonic hearing, the parties are ordered to contact the Courtroom Deputy Clerk, Susan Hall, at 10 (661) 326-6620 or via email at SHall@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsel must comply with Local Rule 251 11 with respect to discovery disputes or the motion will be denied without prejudice and dropped 12 from the Court’s calendar. 13 All dispositive pre-trial motions shall be filed no later than February 5, 2018, and heard no 14 later than March 6, 2018, in Courtroom 5 at 8:30 a.m. before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United 15 States District Court Judge. In scheduling such motions, counsel shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 16 and Local Rules 230 and 260. 17 V. Motions for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication 18 At least 21 days before filing a motion for summary judgment or motion for summary 19 adjudication, the parties are ORDERED to meet, in person or by telephone, to confer about the issues 20 to be raised in the motion. 21 The purpose of the meeting shall be to: 1) avoid filing motions for summary judgment where a 22 question of fact exists; 2) determine whether the respondent agrees that the motion has merit in whole 23 or in part; 3) discuss whether issues can be resolved without the necessity of briefing; 4) narrow the 24 issues for review by the court; 5) explore the possibility of settlement before the parties incur the 25 expense of briefing a motion; and 6) to develop a joint statement of undisputed facts. 26 The moving party SHALL initiate the meeting and SHALL provide a complete, proposed 27 statement of undisputed facts at least five days before the conference. The finalized joint statement of 28 undisputed facts SHALL include all facts that the parties agree, for purposes of the motion, may be 4 1 deemed true. In addition to the requirements of Local Rule 260, the moving party shall file the joint 2 statement of undisputed facts. In the notice of motion the moving party SHALL certify that the parties have met and conferred 3 4 as ordered above, or set forth a statement of good cause for the failure to meet and confer. Failure to 5 comply may result in the motion being stricken. 6 VI. Pre-Trial Conference Date 7 April 16, 2018 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before Judge Drozd. 8 The parties are ordered to file a Joint Pretrial Statement pursuant to Local Rule 281(a)(2). 9 10 The parties are further directed to submit a digital copy of their pretrial statement in Word format, directly to Judge Drozd's chambers, by email at DADorders@caed.uscourts.gov. Counsels' attention is directed to Rules 281 and 282 of the Local Rules of Practice for the 11 12 Eastern District of California, as to the obligations of counsel in preparing for the pre-trial conference. 13 The Court will insist upon strict compliance with those rules. In addition to the matters set forth in the 14 Local Rules the Joint Pretrial Statement shall include a Joint Statement of the case to be used by the 15 Court to explain the nature of the case to the jury during voir dire. 16 VII. 17 18 Trial Date June 12, 2018 at 8:30 a.m. in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable Dale A. Drozd, United States District Court Judge. 19 A. This is a jury trial. 20 B. Counsels' Estimate of Trial Time: 3 days. 21 C. Counsels' attention is directed to Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of 22 California, Rule 285. 23 VIII. Settlement Conference 24 A Settlement Conference is scheduled on March 23, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. at 510 19th Street, 25 Bakersfield, California. Notwithstanding the provisions of Local Rule 270(b), the settlement 26 conference will be conducted by Magistrate Judge Thurston. The Court deems the deviation from the 27 Local Rule to be appropriate and in the interests of the parties and justice and sound case management 28 based upon the location of the parties. If any party prefers that the settlement conference is 5 1 conducted by a judicial officer not already assigned to this case, that party is directed to notify 2 the Court at least 60 days in advance of the scheduled settlement conference to allow sufficient 3 time for another judicial officer to be assigned to handle the conference. 4 Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the Court, the attorneys who will try the case shall 5 appear at the settlement conference with the parties and the person or persons having full authority 6 to negotiate and settle the case on any terms2 at the conference. Consideration of settlement is a 7 serious matter that requires preparation prior to the settlement conference. Set forth below are the 8 procedures the Court will employ, absent good cause, in conducting the conference. 9 At least 21 days before the settlement conference, Plaintiff SHALL submit to Defendant via 10 fax or e-mail, a written itemization of damages and a meaningful3 settlement demand which includes a 11 brief explanation of why such a settlement is appropriate. Thereafter, no later than 14 days before the 12 settlement conference, Defendant SHALL respond via fax or e-mail, with an acceptance of the offer or 13 with a meaningful counteroffer, which includes a brief explanation of why such a settlement is 14 appropriate. 15 If settlement is not achieved, each party SHALL attach copies of their settlement offers to their 16 Confidential Settlement Conference Statement, as described below. Copies of these documents should 17 not be filed on the court docket. CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT 18 19 At least five court days before the settlement conference, the parties shall submit, directly to 20 Judge Thurston's chambers by e-mail to JLTorders@caed.uscourts.gov, a Confidential Settlement 21 Conference Statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk of the Court nor served on 22 any other party, although the parties may file a Notice of Lodging of Settlement Conference 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Insurance carriers, business organizations, and governmental bodies or agencies whose settlement agreements are subject to approval by legislative bodies, executive committees, boards of directors or the like shall be represented by a person or persons who occupy high executive positions in the party organization and who will be directly involved in the process of approval of any settlement offers or agreements. To the extent possible the representative shall have the authority, if he or she deems it appropriate, to settle the action on terms consistent with the opposing party's most recent demand. 3 “Meaningful” means that the offer is reasonably calculated to settle the case on terms acceptable to the offering party. “Meaningful” does not include an offer which the offering party knows will not be acceptable to the other party. If, however, the offering party is only willing to offer a settlement which it knows the other party will not accept, this should trigger a recognition the case is not in a settlement posture and the parties should confer about continuing or vacating the settlement conference via stipulation. 6 1 Statement. Each statement shall be clearly marked "confidential" with the date and time of the 2 settlement conference indicated prominently thereon. 3 The Confidential Settlement Conference Statement shall include the following: 4 A. A brief statement of the facts of the case. 5 B. A brief statement of the claims and defenses, i.e., statutory or other grounds upon which 6 the claims are founded; a forthright evaluation of the parties' likelihood of prevailing on 7 the claims and defenses; and a description of the major issues in dispute. 8 C. A summary of the proceedings to date. 9 D. An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery, pretrial and trial. 10 E. The relief sought. 11 F. The party's position on settlement, including present demands and offers and a history of past settlement discussions, offers and demands. 12 13 IX. Request for Bifurcation, Appointment of Special Master, or other 14 Techniques to Shorten Trial 15 Not applicable at this time. 16 X. There are no pending related matters. 17 18 Related Matters Pending XI. Compliance with Federal Procedure All counsel are expected to familiarize themselves with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 19 20 and the Local Rules of Practice of the Eastern District of California, and to keep abreast of any 21 amendments thereto. The Court must insist upon compliance with these Rules if it is to efficiently 22 handle its increasing case load and sanctions will be imposed for failure to follow both the Federal 23 Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice for the Eastern District of California. 24 XII. 25 Effect of this Order The foregoing order represents the best estimate of the court and counsel as to the agenda most 26 suitable to dispose of this case. The trial date reserved is specifically reserved for this case. If the 27 parties determine at any time that the schedule outlined in this order cannot be met, counsel are ordered 28 to notify the court immediately of that fact so that adjustments may be made, either by stipulation or by 7 1 2 subsequent status conference. The dates set in this Order are considered to be firm and will not be modified absent a 3 showing of good cause even if the request to modify is made by stipulation. Stipulations 4 extending the deadlines contained herein will not be considered unless they are accompanied by 5 affidavits or declarations, and where appropriate attached exhibits, which establish good cause 6 for granting the relief requested. 7 Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 28, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?