Klahn v. Wasco State Prison et al
Filing
34
ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, 1/7/2019 at 10AM in Fresno, Courtroom 6 before Judge Jeremy D. Peterson, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 12/13/2018. (Dunbar-Kari, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DANIEL P. KLAHN, SR.,
12
13
14
15
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00342 DAD-JLT
Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) SETTING SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE, (2) REQUIRING
PERSONAL ATTENDANCE BY CERTAIN
INDIVIDUALS, AND (3) REQUIRING
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
STATEMENT
v.
R. SEITZ,
Defendant,
16
17
18
19
Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson will hold a settlement conference on January 7, 2019 at
20
10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6 at the U.S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721.
21
The court expects that the parties will proceed with the settlement conference in good faith and
22
attempt to resolve all or part of the case. If any party believes that the settlement conference will not
23
be productive, that party shall so inform the court as far in advance of the settlement conference as
24
possible. Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the court, the following individuals must attend
25
the settlement conference in person: (1) all of the attorney(s) who will try the case; (2) the parties; and
26
(3) individuals with full authority to negotiate and settle the case, on any terms.
27
28
No later than one week prior to the settlement conference, each party must submit to Judge
Peterson’s chambers at jdporders@caed.uscourts.gov a confidential settlement conference statement.
1
1
These statements should neither be filed on the docket nor served on any other party. The statements
2
should be marked “CONFIDENTIAL” and should state the date and time of the conference. The
3
statements should not be lengthy but should include (1) a brief recitation of the facts; (2) a discussion
4
of the strengths and weaknesses of the case; (3) an itemized estimate of the expected costs for further
5
pretrial and trial matters; (4) an estimate of recovery should this case proceed to trial; and (5) a candid
6
statement of the party’s position on settlement, including a history of settlement discussions, any
7
current settlement offers from any party, expectations for settlement discussions, and the amount that
8
the party will accept to settle.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated:
December 13, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?