Klahn v. Wasco State Prison et al

Filing 34

ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, 1/7/2019 at 10AM in Fresno, Courtroom 6 before Judge Jeremy D. Peterson, signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 12/13/2018. (Dunbar-Kari, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL P. KLAHN, SR., 12 13 14 15 CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00342 DAD-JLT Plaintiff, ORDER (1) SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE, (2) REQUIRING PERSONAL ATTENDANCE BY CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS, AND (3) REQUIRING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT v. R. SEITZ, Defendant, 16 17 18 19 Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson will hold a settlement conference on January 7, 2019 at 20 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6 at the U.S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721. 21 The court expects that the parties will proceed with the settlement conference in good faith and 22 attempt to resolve all or part of the case. If any party believes that the settlement conference will not 23 be productive, that party shall so inform the court as far in advance of the settlement conference as 24 possible. Unless otherwise permitted in advance by the court, the following individuals must attend 25 the settlement conference in person: (1) all of the attorney(s) who will try the case; (2) the parties; and 26 (3) individuals with full authority to negotiate and settle the case, on any terms. 27 28 No later than one week prior to the settlement conference, each party must submit to Judge Peterson’s chambers at jdporders@caed.uscourts.gov a confidential settlement conference statement. 1 1 These statements should neither be filed on the docket nor served on any other party. The statements 2 should be marked “CONFIDENTIAL” and should state the date and time of the conference. The 3 statements should not be lengthy but should include (1) a brief recitation of the facts; (2) a discussion 4 of the strengths and weaknesses of the case; (3) an itemized estimate of the expected costs for further 5 pretrial and trial matters; (4) an estimate of recovery should this case proceed to trial; and (5) a candid 6 statement of the party’s position on settlement, including a history of settlement discussions, any 7 current settlement offers from any party, expectations for settlement discussions, and the amount that 8 the party will accept to settle. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: December 13, 2018 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?