Securities and Exchange Commission v. BIC Real Estate Development Corporation et al

Filing 364

ORDER re Stipulation Amending Oil Company Sales Procedures and Extending Associated Deadlines signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 4/10/2018. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 DAVID R. ZARO (BAR NO. 124334) JOSHUA A. DEL CASTILLO (BAR NO. 239015) 2 PETER A. GRIFFIN (BAR NO. 306201) ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE 3 MALLORY & NATSIS LLP 865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2800 4 Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Phone: (213) 622-5555 5 Fax: (213) 620-8816 E-Mail: dzaro@allenmatkins.com jdelcastillo@allenmatkins.com 6 pgriffin@allenmatkins.com 7 Attorneys for Receiver 8 DAVID P. STAPLETON 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 BIC REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT 16 CORP., et al., 17 Defendants. Case No. 1:16-cv-00344-LJO-JLT STIPULATION AMENDING OIL COMPANY SALES PROCEDURES AND EXTENDING ASSOCIATED DEADLINES; ORDER THEREON Date: NO HEARING REQUIRED Ctrm: 4 Judge: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill 18 19 STIPULATION 20 The following Stipulation Amending Oil Company Sales Procedures and 21 Extending Associated Deadlines (the "Stipulation") is made by and between: (1) 22 David P. Stapleton (the "Receiver"), the Court-appointed receiver for Defendants 23 BIC Real Estate Development Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates, 24 including but not limited to, WM Petroleum; Target Oil & Gas Drilling, Inc.; Tier 1 25 Solar Power Company; Tier 1 Solar Power Company, LLC; and Home Sweet 26 Holdings (collectively, the "Receivership Entities"); (2) Plaintiff Securities and 27 Exchange Commission (the "SEC"); and (3) Defendant Daniel Nase (collectively, 28 LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP Case No. 1:16-cv-00344-LJO-JLT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: OIL COMPANY SALE PROCEDURES 1 with the Receiver and the SEC, the "Parties") by and through their respective 2 counsel of record, and in reliance on and with respect to the following facts: 3 A. On July 27, 2017, this Court entered its Order Authorizing and 4 Approving Receiver's Sales Procedures for Oil Company and Authorizing 5 Receiver's Engagement of Oil Company Broker (the "Oil Company Sales 6 Procedures Order") (Dkt. No. 268), approving and authorizing the sales procedures 7 and deadlines proposed, on Motion by the Receiver (the "Sales Procedures 8 Motion"), in connection with his anticipated marketing and sale of the assets of WM 9 Petroleum, Target Oil & Gas Drilling, Inc., and affiliated entities (collectively, the 10 "Oil Company Assets"), as well as the Receiver's engagement and compensation of 11 a specialized petroleum industry broker, Energy Net (Dkt. Nos. 249-251). 12 B. On November 15, 2017, on motion by the Receiver, the Court entered 13 an order extending certain deadlines associated with the Receiver's anticipated sale 14 of the Oil Company Assets (Dkt. No. 320). 15 C. Since the Court's entry of the Oil Company Sales Procedures Order, the 16 Receiver, his Court-approved broker, EnergyNet, and his counsel of record, Allen 17 Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP, have been engaged in significant 18 marketing and sale-related efforts, including listing the Oil Company Assets for sale 19 on appropriate exchanges, solicitation of offers from at least 4 prospective buyers, 20 the preparation of a form Purchase and Sale Agreement ("PSA"), the identification 21 of a contemplated stalking horse bidder for the Oil Company Assets in accordance 22 with the Sales Procedures Order, and negotiating and tailoring the PSA to the 23 purchase terms agreed to by the Receiver's original stalking horse bidder. 24 D. In mid-March 2018, the Receiver's original stalking horse bidder 25 notified him that it would be withdrawing from its contemplated purchase of the Oil 26 Company Assets. Since then, the Receiver has renewed negotiations with other 27 interested parties and tentatively agreed upon deal terms with a new anticipated 28 stalking horse bidder. LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP -2- Case No. 1:16-cv-00344-LJO-JLT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: OIL COMPANY SALE PROCEDURES 1 E. The Receiver's new stalking horse bidder is organizationally distinct 2 from his original stalking horse bidder. As a consequence, the Receiver has had to 3 renegotiate and revise certain portions of the PSA and to commence previously 4 unnecessary discussions with the Receivership Entities' mineral rights holders 5 regarding the assignment of leases to the new stalking horse, as well as to 6 potentially similarly situated overbidders. 7 F. The Receiver is informed and understands that his new stalking horse, 8 as well as all other parties who have indicated an intention to qualify as bidders for 9 the Oil Company Assets, must satisfy certain mineral rights holder requirements 10 regarding the assignability of leases, which requirements can take as many as 90 11 days to satisfy. 12 G. As a consequence of the above, the Receiver has determined, in his 13 reasonable business judgment, that it is appropriate to: (1) amend the Oil Company 14 Sales Procedures Order to provide that all prospective purchasers of the Oil 15 Company Assets, whether the current stalking horse bidder or other potential 16 qualified bidders, must satisfy any existing mineral rights holder assignment 17 requirements prior to any hearing on the proposed sale of the Oil Company Assets; 18 and (2) extend all deadlines associated with the Court-approved sales procedures for 19 the Oil Company Assets by a further 120 days, to permit both the present stalking 20 horse bidder and any prospective overbidders to satisfy such requirements. 21 22 STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT Accordingly, and in consideration of the foregoing, the Parties hereby 23 STIPULATE and AGREE as follows: 24 1. Effective immediately upon the entry of an order approving this 25 Stipulation, the Court-approved sales procedures for the Oil Company Assets, as 26 reflected in the Oil Company Sales Procedures Order, shall be amended to provide 27 that a "Qualified Bidder", as described in the Sales Procedures Motion and Oil 28 Company Sales Procedures Order, is defined as follows: LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP -3- Case No. 1:16-cv-00344-LJO-JLT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: OIL COMPANY SALE PROCEDURES 1 "A Qualified Bidder is a prospective purchaser who, no later 2 than 10 business days prior to a scheduled hearing (the "Sale 3 Hearing") on the Receiver's proposed sale of the Oil Company 4 Assets: 5 (i) confirms, in writing, its commitment to execute a 6 PSA for the Oil Company Assets with terms substantially 7 similar to the terms of the Receiver's PSA(s) with the Receiver's 8 stalking 9 Buyer(s)"); horse bidder or bidders (the "Recommended 10 (ii) provides evidence, in a form reasonably acceptable 11 to the Receiver, that the Qualified Bidder has the ability to pay 12 the purchase price for the Oil Company Assets proposed by the 13 Recommended Buyer(s) (the "Purchase Price"), plus the 14 minimum initial overbid amount set forth below; 15 (iii) provides an earnest money deposit by wire transfer 16 or cashier's check in the amount of 10% of the Purchase Price, 17 payable to the Receiver, which amount shall be non-refundable 18 to the Qualified Bidder with the highest and best bid at the 19 auction if for any reason: (a) the highest and best bidder fails to 20 timely close the sale; or (b) the highest and best bidder fails to 21 provide the balance of the Purchase Price to the Receiver within 22 5 business days following the Sale Hearing; 23 (iv) provides the Receiver with written confirmation that 24 it can satisfy any requirements imposed by the Receivership 25 Entities' mineral rights holders regarding the assignment of Oil 26 Company Asset-associated leases; and 27 28 LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP -4- Case No. 1:16-cv-00344-LJO-JLT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: OIL COMPANY SALE PROCEDURES 1 (v) provides the Receiver and his counsel of record with 2 written notice of its intent to appear and bid at the Sale Hearing, 3 at least 7 days before the Sale Hearing." 4 2. In order to maximize the likelihood that the Receiver's new stalking 5 horse bidder and any prospective qualified bidders for the Oil Company Assets have 6 sufficient time to attempt to satisfy any mineral rights assignment requirements, the 7 Court will hear any motion for the Receiver to approve the sale of the Oil Company 8 Assets within 45 days after the filing of such motion, provided that the Receiver 9 must still publish notice of his intent to sell the Oil Company Assets, in accordance 10 with 28 U.S.C. § 2001, et seq., no fewer than 4 weeks prior to any hearing on the 11 proposed sale, as previously ordered by the Court; and 12 3. Effective immediately upon the entry of an order approving this 13 Stipulation, all pending deadlines associated with the Receiver's proposed marketing 14 and sale of the Oil Company Assets, shall be extended by a further 120 days. 15 16 SO STIPULATED. 17 18 Dated: April 9, 2018 19 20 21 ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP DAVID R. ZARO JOSHUA A. DEL CASTILLO PETER A. GRIFFIN By: 22 23 24 Dated: April 9, 2018 /s/ Joshua A. del Castillo JOSHUA A. DEL CASTILLO Attorneys for Receiver DAVID P. STAPLETON 25 U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 26 By: 27 28 LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP -5- /s/ John B. Bulgozdy JOHN B. BULGOZDY Attorneys for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Case No. 1:16-cv-00344-LJO-JLT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: OIL COMPANY SALE PROCEDURES 1 Dated: April 9, 2018 VICK LAW GROUP APC T. SCOTT VICK 2 3 By: 4 5 /s/ T. Scott Vick T. SCOTT VICK Attorneys for Defendant DANIEL NASE 6 7 ORDER 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 Dated: April 10, 2018 11 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____ UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP -6- Case No. 1:16-cv-00344-LJO-JLT STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: OIL COMPANY SALE PROCEDURES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?