Securities and Exchange Commission v. BIC Real Estate Development Corporation et al

Filing 43

ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION (Doc. 38) signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 12, 2016. (Munoz, I)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 5 8 ORDER RE EX PARTE APPLICATION (Doc. 38) Plaintiff, 6 7 1:16-cv-344-LJO-JLT v. BIC REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 9 The Court has received and reviewed the ex parte application of Federal Equity Receiver David 10 11 Stapleton (“the Receiver”) in which he seeks a court order (1) authorizing his 6-month budget plan for 12 the Receivership and (2) authorizing his use of the law firm of Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & 13 Natsis LLP (“Allen Matkins”) to assist the Receivership. See Doc. 38 at 2. The Receiver requests that 14 the Court permit him to incur $160,000-$200,000 in costs and for Allen Matkins to incur $130,00015 $175,000 in costs in the next six months. See Doc. 39 at 4. The Court authorizes the Receiver to incur $80,000 in costs and Allen Matkins to incur $65,000 16 17 in costs through June 12, 2016. On or before June 12, 2016, the Receiver shall submit a report to the 18 Court in which he shall (1) outline the tasks the Receivership has performed and the costs it has 19 incurred; (2) outline the tasks the Receivership intends to perform through October 2016; and (3) 20 provide a reasoned estimate of the Receiver’s and Allen Matkins’s projected costs through October 21 2016. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill April 12, 2016 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?