Securities and Exchange Commission v. BIC Real Estate Development Corporation et al
Filing
46
ORDER RE RECEIVERS STATEMENT OF ANALYSIS OF SOURCE OF FUNDS IN DEFENDANTS PERSONAL ACCOUNT (Doc. 44) signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on April 18, 2016. (Munoz, I)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
9
10
ORDER RE RECEIVER’S
STATEMENT OF ANALYSIS OF
SOURCE OF FUNDS IN
DEFENDANT’S PERSONAL
ACCOUNT (Doc. 44)
Plaintiff,
7
8
1:16-cv-344-LJO-JLT
v.
BIC REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CORP.,
et al.,
Defendants.
11
12
13
14
15
The Court-appointed Receiver recently submitted his analysis of the source of funds located in
16 Defendant Daniel Nase’s personal Wells Fargo Bank account (ending in 4508) (“the Personal
17 Account”). The Receiver states, among other things, that between February 29, 2016 and April 1, 2016,
18
19
20
[the] Personal Account was the recipient [of] nearly $65,000 in funds transferred from the
Receivership Entities (including the more than $57,000 addressed in the Receiver's previously
submitted Initial Report and Inventory), as well as nearly $144,000 in funds transferred from
Lending Club, which funds the Commission has alleged originated with Receivership Entity
investors.
21 Doc. 44 at 4. Accordingly, the Receiver requests that the entire balance of the Personal Account, as it
22 stood on April 1, 2016, be turned over to the Receiver. Id. at 5.
23
The Court ORDERS Defendant Daniel Nase to comply with the Receiver’s request by April 20,
24
25
1
1
2016.1 Further, commencing immediately, the Court ORDERS the Personal Account frozen until the
2
Court can confirm the amount and source of its funds.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
April 18, 2016
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
The Court requests that the Receiver inform the Court immediately if Defendant has not complied with this Order.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?