Shehee v. Cosby et al

Filing 41

ORDER ADOPTING 36 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Denying Plaintiff's 34 35 Motions for Access to Photocopy Services signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 01/30/2017. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GREGORY ELL SHEHEE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ACCESS TO
PHOTOCOPY SERVICES

COSBY, et al.,

15

No. 1:16-cv-00354-DAD-SAB (PC)

Defendants.
(Doc. Nos. 34, 35, 36)

16

Plaintiff is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought

17
18

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. At the time the complaint in this action was filed, plaintiff was a

19

civil detainee.

20

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

21

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 1, 2016, the assigned magistrate judge issued

22

findings and recommendations recommending plaintiff’s motions for access to photocopy

23

services be denied. The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained

24

notice that objections thereto were to be filed within thirty days. The thirty day time frame has

25

expired and no objections were filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the undersigned has

26
27

conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the

28

/////
1

1

undersigned concludes the findings and recommendation are supported by the record and by

2

proper analysis.

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Accordingly,
1. The findings and recommendations issued on December 1, 2016 (Doc. No. 36), are
adopted in full; and
2. Plaintiff’s motions for a court order directing that he be provided access to photocopying
services (Doc. Nos. 34, 35) are denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 30, 2017
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2