Jefferson v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action should not be Dismissed for Failure to State a Claim, Failure to Comply with a Court Order, and Failure to Prosecute; Show Cause Response due within Fourteen (14) Days signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 10/24/2017. (Sant Agata, S)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
KEON L. JEFFERSON,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER,
AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Case No. 1:16-cv-00359-SAB-PC
J. KATAVICH, et al.,
(ECF No. 10)
FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff Keon L. Jefferson is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
20 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to
21 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). (ECF No. 4.)
On September 12, 2017, the Court screened and dismissed Plaintiff’s second amended
23 complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff
24 was directed to file a third amended complaint within thirty days from the date of service of that
25 order. (Id. at 7-8.) More than thirty days have passed, and Plaintiff has not complied with the
26 Court’s order or otherwise communicated with the Court.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen (14) days of the date of
28 service of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause in writing as to why this action should not be
1 dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the September 12, 2017 order. In the alternative,
2 Plaintiff may comply with this order by filing a third amended complaint or notice of voluntary
3 dismissal of this case within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of this order. Plaintiff is
4 warned that the failure to timely comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this
IT IS SO ORDERED.
October 24, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?