Carter v. Davey, et al.

Filing 10

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Follow Court Order and Failure to Prosecute, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/25/16. Show Cause Response Due Within Thirty Days. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

MARCUS CARTER,

11

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO FOLLOW COURT ORDER
AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

DAVEY, et al.,

14

Case No. 1:16-cv-00365 DLB

Defendants.
_____________________________________/

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
15
Plaintiff Marcus Carter (“Plaintiff”), a state inmate in the custody of the California

16

17 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), is proceeding pro se and in forma
18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this action on
1
19 March 8, 2016.

On June 8, 2016, the Court screened the complaint and ordered Plaintiff to either file an

20

21 amended complaint, or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed only on the cognizable
22 claim. Pursuant to that order, an amended complaint was due within thirty (30) days. Over thirty
23 (30) days have passed and he has not responded to the order or otherwise contacted the Court.
Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why this action

24

25 should not be dismissed for failure to follow a Court order and failure to prosecute. Plaintiff must
26 ///
27 ///
28

1

Plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the United States Magistrate Judge on March 21, 2016.

1 file a response to this order within thirty (30) days. Plaintiff may also comply by filing a response
2 to the June 8, 2016, order.
3

Failure to follow this order will result in dismissal of this action.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Dennis

July 25, 2016

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2