Carter v. Davey, et al.

Filing 17

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why case should not be dismissed for failure to follow court order and failure to prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 10/18/2017. Show Cause Response due within 14-Days. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MARCUS CARTER,
Plaintiff,

12

v.

13
14

1:16-cv-00365-GSA-PC

DAVEY, et al.,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO FOLLOW COURT ORDER AND FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE
(ECF No. 16.)

Defendants.

15

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

16
17
18

I.

BACKGROUND

19

Marcus Carter (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

20

with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint

21

commencing this action on March 8, 2016, at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of

22

California, Sacramento Division. (ECF No. 1.) On March 16, 2016, the case was transferred to

23

the Fresno Division. (ECF No. 4.)

24

On March 21, 2016, Plaintiff consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this action

25

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), and no other parties have made an appearance. (ECF No. 7.)

26

Therefore, pursuant to Appendix A(k)(4) of the Local Rules of the Eastern District of

27

California, the undersigned shall conduct any and all proceedings in the case until such time as

28

reassignment to a District Judge is required. Local Rule Appendix A(k)(3).
1

1

On August 28, 2017, the court screened the First Amended Complaint and issued an

2

order dismissing the First Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend

3

within thirty days. (ECF No. 16.) The thirty-day deadline has passed, and Plaintiff has not

4

filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

5

Accordingly, Plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, if any he has, why this

6

action should not be dismissed for failure to follow a court order and failure to prosecute.

7

Plaintiff must file a response to this order within fourteen (14) days. Plaintiff may also

8

comply by filing a response to the August 28, 2017, order.

9

Failure to follow this order will result in dismissal of this action.

10
11
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 18, 2017

/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2