Atayde v. Napa State Hospital et al
Filing
134
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation requesting an order shortening time (ECF No. 130) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/21/2019. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LUCY ATAYDE,
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 1:16-cv-00398-DAD-SAB
ORDER DENYING STIPULATION FOR
ORDER SHORTENING TIME
v.
(ECF No. 130)
14
NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
On May 14, 2019, Intervenors Ai Qiong Zhong, W.L., and Mai Chau (“Intervenors”),
18 who are plaintiffs in a related matter, filed a motion to intervene for the purpose of modifying the
19 protective order entered in this matter in order to obtain certain discovery. (ECF No. 128.) On
20 May 14, 2019, the Intervenors also filed a stipulation for an order shortening the time to hear the
21 motion to intervene. (ECF No. 130.) The Court notes that the stipulation appears to only be
22 signed on behalf of the Intervenors, and some, but not all, of the Defendants in this matter. (ECF
23 No. 130.)
Additionally, the filing does not comply with the Local Rules pertaining to
24 applications to shorten time, which requires such applications to “set forth by affidavit of counsel
25 the circumstances claimed to justify the issuance of an order shortening time.” L.R. 144(e).
26 Further, “[e]x parte applications to shorten time will not be granted except upon affidavit of
27 counsel showing a satisfactory explanation for the need for the issuance of such an order and for
28 the failure of counsel to obtain a stipulation for the issuance of such an order from other counsel
1
1 or parties in the action.” Id.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the stipulation requesting an order
2
3 shortening time (ECF No. 130) is DENIED without prejudice.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 Dated:
May 21, 2019
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?