Atayde v. Napa State Hospital et al

Filing 141

ORDER RE STIPULATION RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT PRODUCTION. Pursuant to the agreement of all the parties in this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above stipulation is entered. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/23/2019. (Hernandez, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LUCY ATAYDE, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:16-cv-00398-DAD-SAB ORDER RE STIPULATION RE CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT PRODUCTION v. NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, et al., (ECF Nos. 136, 138, 139, 140) Defendants. 16 17 On May 14, 2019, Intervenors Ai Qiong Zhong, W.L., and Mai Chau (“Intervenors”), 18 who are plaintiffs in a related matter, filed a motion to intervene for the purpose of modifying the 19 protective order entered in this matter in order to obtain certain discovery. (ECF No. 128.) On 20 May 21, 2019, Plaintiff filed a stipulation that will remove the confidential designation over 21 these discovery materials and allow production of such materials to the intervenors. Because the 22 stipulation was not signed by all parties in the action, the Court ordered the Defendants that were 23 not signatories to the stipulation to file a statement signifying whether they oppose the entry of 24 the stipulation (ECF No. 138). On May 22, 2019, Defendants California Forensic Medical 25 Group, Inc., Taylor Fithian, Heather Goode, Sean Ryan, Deborah Mandujano, Corina Denning, 26 Merced County, Tom Cavallero, and Jason Goins, filed statements signifying they do not oppose 27 entry of the stipulation. (ECF Nos. 139, 140.) Accordingly, as all parties agree to entry of the 28 stipulation, the Court enters the below stipulation. 1 STIPULATION 1 2 Plaintiff and Defendants California Department of State Hospitals, Napa State Hospital, 3 and the individual State of California Defendants (collectively the “State Defendants”), hereby 4 stipulate to the following: 5 6 1. This case involves the suicide of Richard Ramirez in Merced County jail, while 7 he waited to be transferred to Napa State Hospital (“NSH”) after he was found incompetent to 8 stand trial (“IST”) pursuant to California Penal Code § 1370. Plaintiff alleges that the State 9 Defendants are deliberately indifferent to the rights and safety of IST inmates by failing or 10 11 refusing to admit them when they are ordered committed to a State Hospital; requiring inmates to wait on waiting lists for weeks and months after courts order them to be committed to the State 12 13 14 Hospital; refusing to triage the IST inmates or review their psychiatric acuity before placing them on the waiting list; and refusing to inform Courts, District Attorneys, Defense counsel, and 15 the inmates’ next of kin of the delay in admitting the inmates. The State Defendants deny all of 16 Plaintiff’s allegations. 17 18 2. The State Defendants have produced voluminous relevant waiting lists in which they have kept track of IST inmates and their waits for admission to a State Hospital. 19 3. Exhibit A attached hereto is a sample page from the Direct Admission Waiting 20 21 List produced by Defendant Dana White, RN, at her deposition. The list is 638 pages long and 22 bears the names of IST inmates other than Richard Ramirez, which Plaintiff’s counsel has 23 redacted for purposes of this stipulation. The parties initially designated the list confidential 24 during the deposition of Ms. White, to preserve the confidentiality of the IST Defendants 25 awaiting transfer to NSH. 26 4. Pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 5328, subdivision (a)(6), 27 the parties hereby agree that the Direct Admission Waiting List that was produced by Ms. White 28 2 1 at her deposition, and any subsequently produced versions of the same list, shall be produced in 2 this matter in the administration of justice, and the confidentiality designation over this document 3 is removed. 4 5. Exhibit B contains examples of other waiting lists or analyses of waiting lists 5 6 produced by the State Defendants and designated as confidential in this matter. The parties agree 7 to remove the confidentiality designations from the documents that do not mention any 8 individual patients by name, including the IST Pending Admission Analyses (Exhibit B, p. 1) 9 and the Weekly Pending Placement Reports (Exhibit B, p. 7). The remaining waiting lists shall 10 11 be produced in the administration of justice pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 5328, subdivision (a)(6), and the confidentiality designations are removed from them. 12 13 14 Plaintiff’s counsel has redacted the names of the IST inmates from the waiting lists in Exhibit B that contain names of individuals. 15 IT IS SO STIPULATED 16 17 Dated: May 14, 2019 18 19 20 21 HADDAD & SHERWIN LLP LAW OFFICE OF SANJAY S. SCHMIDT /s/ Julia Sherwin JULIA SHERWIN Attorneys for Plaintiff LUCY ATAYDE 22 23 Dated: May 21, 2019 24 25 26 XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California PETER A. MESHOT Supervising Deputy Attorney General AMIE MCTAVISH Deputy Attorney General 27 /s/ Amie McTavish* 28 AMIE MCTAVISH 3 Attorneys for Defendants NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, CALIFORNIA 2 DEPARTMENT OF STATE HOSPITALS, CDSH DIRECTOR DOLLY MATTEUCCI, AND DANA 3 WHITE, R.N. *Ms. McTavish gives permission to file this document with her electronic signature. 4 1 5 6 ORDER 7 Pursuant to the agreement of all the parties in this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 8 that the above stipulation is entered. 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 Dated: May 23, 2019 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?