Atayde v. Napa State Hospital et al
Filing
90
ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO JANUARY 23, 2017. The scheduling conference set for December 20, 2016, is CONTINUED to January 23, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9; and The parties shall file a new joint scheduling report one week prior t o the scheduling conference as to proposed dates only. The new joint scheduling report shall only contain proposed dates for the discovery plan, filing of non-dispositive and dispositive pre-trial motions, pre-trial conference, and trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 12/19/2016. (Hernandez, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
LUCY ATAYDE,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 1:16-cv-00398-DAD-SAB
ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING
CONFERENCE TO JANUARY 23, 2017 AT
9:30 A.M.
v.
NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, et al,
Defendants.
17
18
On September 27, 2016, a mandatory scheduling conference was set in this action for
19 December 20, 2016. (ECF No. 65.) On December 6, 2016, Defendants’ Tom Cavallero, Jason
20 Goins, Merced County, Dolly Matteucci, Napa State Hospital, and Dana White’s motions to
21 dismiss were argued and submitted. (ECF No. 88.) Due to the pending motions to dismiss, the
22 scheduling conference is continued from December 20, 2016, to January 23, 2017, at 9:30 a.m.
23 in Courtroom 9.
24
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
25
1. The scheduling conference set for December 20, 2016, is CONTINUED to January
26
23, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 9; and
27
2. The parties shall file a new joint scheduling report one week prior to the scheduling
28
conference as to proposed dates only. The new joint scheduling report shall only
1
1
contain proposed dates for the discovery plan, filing of non-dispositive and
2
dispositive pre-trial motions, pre-trial conference, and trial.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5 Dated:
December 19, 2016
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?