Manago v. Davey et al

Filing 149

ORDER Giving Full Effect to Stipulation to Dismiss Case, with Prejudice, Under Rule 41; ORDER for Clerk to Close Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 08/16/2021. CASE CLOSED. (Maldonado, C)

Download PDF
Case 1:16-cv-00399-DAD-GSA Document 149 Filed 08/16/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEWART MANAGO, 12 13 14 Plaintiff, vs. D. DAVEY, et al., 15 1:16-cv-00399-NONE-GSA-PC ORDER GIVING FULL EFFECT TO STIPULATION TO DISMISS CASE, WITH PREJUDICE, UNDER RULE 41 (ECF No. 148.) ORDER FOR CLERK TO CLOSE CASE Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 Stewart Manago (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with 21 this civil rights action filed on March 24, 2016, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now 22 proceeds with the First Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff on April 18, 2016, against 23 defendants J. Acevedo, D. Davey, A. Maxfield, E. Razo, M. Sexton, A. Valdez, and J. 24 Vanderpoel (collectively, “Defendants”), on Plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliation claims. 25 (ECF No. 13.) 26 On August 13, 2021, a stipulation for voluntary dismissal with prejudice was filed with 27 the Court containing the signatures of Plaintiff and Counsel for Defendants. (ECF No. 148.) The 28 stipulation states that Plaintiff and Defendants have resolved this case in its entirety and therefore 1 Case 1:16-cv-00399-DAD-GSA Document 149 Filed 08/16/21 Page 2 of 2 1 stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 2 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 3 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) allows plaintiffs to “dismiss an action 4 without a court order by filing a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” 5 The stipulation filed on August 13, 2021 is signed by all parties who have appeared in this case. 6 Therefore, the parties’ stipulation is given full force and effect, and this case is dismissed with 7 prejudice. The Clerk shall close the case. 8 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 9 1. 10 The parties’ stipulation for voluntary dismissal of this action with prejudice is effective as of the date it was filed; 11 2. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE under Rule 41; and 12 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. 13 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 16, 2021 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?