Manago v. Davey et al
Filing
39
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 38 Motion for assistance in contacting witnesses signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/6/2016. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
STEWART MANAGO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
DAVEY, et al.,
15
No. 1:16-cv-00399 LJO DLB PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR ASSISTANCE IN CONTACTING
WITNESSES
(Document 38)
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff Stewart Manago (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
17
18
pauperis, filed this civil rights action on March 24, 2016. The action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s
19
First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendants Davey, Sexton, Vander Poel, Maxfield,
20
Valdez, Acevedo and Razo. Specifically, Plaintiff alleges that Defendants retained him in the
21
SHU because of his grievances. The Court directed the United States Marshal to serve
22
Defendants on June 3, 2016. There is no indication that any Defendants have been served at this
23
time.
On June 20, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a Court order directing CDCR
24
25
management to allow him to contact his inmate witnesses. However, Plaintiff must first utilize
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
1
CDCR procedures related to correspondence prior to seeking relief from the Court. 15
2
Cal.Code.Regs. § 3139.1
3
Plaintiff is also informed that the Court does not have jurisdiction in this action over
4
anyone other than Plaintiff and Defendants, and the Court can only make a request to prison
5
officials. Such a request shall not be made by the Court without assurances that (1) Plaintiff has
6
followed procedures and used the available resources at the prison, and (2) each witness has
7
relevant knowledge.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED.
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
July 6, 2016
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
11
28
Plaintiff states that he is set to parole on July 7, 2016. Even if he paroles, there are CDCR procedures related to
correspondence and visiting that must be followed.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?