Furnace v. Cope et al

Filing 61

ORDER Adopting 58 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING Plaintiff's 57 Motion for a Preliminary Injunction signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/10/2019. (Sant Agata, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

EDWARD FURNACE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 1:16-cv-00420-DAD-BAM

v.

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

L. VILLA,

15

Defendant.
(Doc. Nos. 57, 58)

16
17

Plaintiff Edward Furnace is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in

18
19

this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

20

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On March 29, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations,

21
22

recommending that plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 57) be denied. (Doc.

23

No. 58.) The findings and recommendations were served on plaintiff and contained notice that

24

any objections were to be filed within fourteen days after service. (Doc. No. 58.) To date, no

25

objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed, and the time in which to do so

26

has now passed.

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C), this court has conducted a

2

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings

3

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.1

4

Accordingly,

5

1.

6

adopted in full; and

7
8

The findings and recommendations issued on March 29, 2019 (Doc. No. 58) are

2.

Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 57) is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

Dated:

June 10, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

In addition, the court notes that although plaintiff has not filed an updated notice of change of
address, defendant Villa’s most recent filing of April 9, 2019 was served on plaintiff at Pelican
Bay State Prison. (See Doc. No. 58.) Plaintiff is reminded that, in the future, it is his
responsibility to notify the court of any changes in his current address. See Local Rule 183.
2