Cook v. City of California City et al

Filing 22

ORDER GRANTING 21 Stipulation for Fifteen-Day Extension to Respond to First Amended Complaint, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/25/2016. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11 CHARLES ACE COOK, JR.,
Plaintiff,

12
v.

13

14 CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, et al.,

Case No. 1:16-CV-00429-DAD-JLT
[PROPOSED]1 ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION FOR FIFTEEN-DAY
EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
(Doc. 21)

Defendants.

15
16
17

Based upon the stipulation of counsel to allow a second extension of time to file a responsive

18 pleading, the Court ORDERS:
19

1.

The stipulation is GRANTED. Defendants, CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY, TOM

20 WILLIAM WEIL, WILLIAM ROBERT SMITH, and SHANNON HAYES SHALL file their
21 pleading responsive to the first amended complaint, no later than August 10, 2016.
22
23 IT IS SO ORDERED.
24

Dated:

July 25, 2016

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28

1

Counsel are referred to the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California. Unlike the Central District of
California, this Court does not require counsel to file pleadings using a 14-point font.