Myers v. CSS
Filing
32
STIPULATION and ORDER Approving Settlement of Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 USC2 412(d) and Costs Pursuant to 28 USC 1920, signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 12/15/17. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
FRESNO DIVISION
7
8
9
10
11
DAVID KEITH MYERS,
Plaintiff,
vs.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
12
Defendant.
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 1:16-cv-00430-GSA
STIPULATION AND ORDER APPROVING
SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND
COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned
15
counsel, subject to the Court’s approval, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees in the amount of
16
SIX THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($6,150) under the Equal Access to
17
Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED
18
DOLLARS ($400) under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal
19
services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in
20
accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920; 2412(d).
21
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will consider
22
the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v.
23
Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the
24
fees are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s
25
Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the government will determine
26
whether they are subject to any offset.
27
28
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines
that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees,
1
1
expenses and costs to be made directly to James A. Yoro pursuant to the assignment executed by
2
Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel.
3
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA
4
attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of
5
Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a
6
complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel,
7
including James A. Yoro, may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection
8
with this action.
9
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel and/or Chain | Cohn |
10
Stiles to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the savings
11
clause provisions of the EAJA.
12
Respectfully submitted,
13
14
Dated: December 11, 2017
15
16
By: /s/ Carolyn B. Chen for James A. Yoro
(As authorized by email on 12/11/2017)
JAMES A. YORO
CHAIN | COHN | STILES
Attorneys for Plaintiff
17
PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
DEBORAH LEE STACHEL
Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
Social Security Administration
18
19
20
21
23
By: /s/ Carolyn B. Chen
CAROLYN B. CHEN
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
24
ORDER
22
25
Dated: December 11, 2017
Pursuant to the above stipulation, Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount
26
27
28
of SIX THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS ($6,150) as authorized by 28 U.S.C.
§ 2412(d), and costs in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400) under 28 U.S.C. §
2
1
2
1920. Any payments shall be subject to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598 (2010) and the terms
of the above-referenced Stipulation.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated:
December 15, 2017
/s/ Gary S. Austin
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?