Kern County Hospital Authority v. Cigna Healthcare of California, Inc.

Filing 36

ORDER CLOSING THE CASE as to DEFENDANT GILSBAR LLC, ONLY 35 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 1/23/2017. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 KERN COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY, a California special health authority, which owns and operates KERN MEDICAL CENTER 14 Case No.: 1:16-CV-00432-DAD-JLT [PROPOSED] ORDER CLOSING THE CASE AS TO DISMISS DEFENDANT GILSBAR LLC ONLY Plaintiff 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 vs. CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF CALIFORNIA, INC., a California for profit corporation; CIGNA HEALTH & LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut for profit corporation; GILSBAR LLC, a Louisiana limited liability company; and DOES 3 THROUGH 25, INCLUSIVE 22 23 Defendants. 24 25 On January 20, 2017, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the action as to defendant 26 Gilsbar only. The parties agree that the matter will be dismissed with prejudice and that each 27 side will bear their own costs. 28 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41 provides that “the plaintiff may dismiss an 13470 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT GILSBAR LLC ONLY 1 action without a court order by filing: . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who 2 have appeared.”. . .” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). Once such a notice has been filed, an order of the 3 Court is not required to make the dismissal effective. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii); Wilson v. City 4 of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED 5 to close this action as to defendant Gilsbar only in light of the stipulation of counsel filed and 6 properly signed pursuant to Rule 41(a). 7 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 22, 2017 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 13470 -2- [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT GILSBAR LLC ONLY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?