King v. Martinez, et al.

Filing 49

ORDER ADOOPTING 39 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, and Denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment signed by Chief Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 05/18/2017.(Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

MARIO KING,

12

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

W.S. WADKINS,

15

Defendant.

16

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
[ECF Nos. 36, 37, 39]

Plaintiff Mario King is a state prisoner and appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

17
18

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00433-LJO-SAB (PC)

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

19
20

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 6, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and

21

Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment be denied. The

22

Findings and Recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that objections were

23

to be filed within thirty days. Over thirty days have passed and no objections were filed.

24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

25

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

26

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

27

///

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on April 6, 2017, are adopted in full; and

3

2.

Plaintiff’s motions for summary judgment are denied.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill _____

May 18, 2017

UNITED STATES CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2