King v. Martinez, et al.

Filing 59

ORDER regarding Plaintiff's 58 Opposition to Defendant's Settlement Offer, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 06/28/17. (Martin-Gill, S)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7

MARIO KING,

8

Plaintiff,

9

v.

10

W.S. WADKINS,

11

Defendant.

12

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 1:16-cv-00433-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S
SETTLEMENT OFFER
[ECF No. 58]

13
Plaintiff Mario King is a state prisoner and appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

14
15

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On June 9, 2017, a settlement conference was held in this case before United States Magistrate

16
17

Judge Michael J. Seng, and the case did not settle.
On June 26, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement negotiations. Plaintiff’s sets forth his

18
19

demands for settlement in this case. Plaintiff is advised that settlement offers and/or negotiations

20

between the parties shall be not be filed with the Court. In addition, any demand by Plaintiff for

21

employment termination sanctions against Defendant is not a proper form of relief in a section 1983

22

action. Accordingly, there is no basis for relief on Plaintiff’s counteroffer for settlement.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated:

26

June 28, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1