King v. Martinez, et al.
Filing
77
ORDER DENYING As Moot Plaintiff's Objections to Court's Order to Re-Open Discovery 75 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/19/17. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MARIO KING,
12
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
W.S. WADKINS,
15
Defendant.
16
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTIONS TO COURT’S ORDER TO REOPEN DISCOVERY
[ECF No. 75]
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On September 15, 2017, Plaintiff filed objections to the Court’s September 1, 2017, order
19
20
Case No.: 1:16-cv-00433-LJO-SAB (PC)
Plaintiff Mario King is a state prisoner and appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
denying his motion to re-open discovery.
Plaintiff contends that he has been diligent in attempting to prosecute this action and seek
21
22
discovery from Defendant. Plaintiff specifically contends that Defendant is in possession of his first
23
set of interrogatories and first set of requests for production of documents.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
Inasmuch as on September 13, 2017, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to compel but directed
1
2
Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and first set of requests for production of
3
documents, Plaintiff’s objections are moot and shall be denied.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated:
7
September 19, 2017
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?