King v. Martinez, et al.

Filing 77

ORDER DENYING As Moot Plaintiff's Objections to Court's Order to Re-Open Discovery 75 , signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 09/19/17. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIO KING, 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 W.S. WADKINS, 15 Defendant. 16 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO COURT’S ORDER TO REOPEN DISCOVERY [ECF No. 75] rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 15, 2017, Plaintiff filed objections to the Court’s September 1, 2017, order 19 20 Case No.: 1:16-cv-00433-LJO-SAB (PC) Plaintiff Mario King is a state prisoner and appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) denying his motion to re-open discovery. Plaintiff contends that he has been diligent in attempting to prosecute this action and seek 21 22 discovery from Defendant. Plaintiff specifically contends that Defendant is in possession of his first 23 set of interrogatories and first set of requests for production of documents. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 Inasmuch as on September 13, 2017, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion to compel but directed 1 2 Defendant to respond to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and first set of requests for production of 3 documents, Plaintiff’s objections are moot and shall be denied. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 Dated: 7 September 19, 2017 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?