Henson v. C.D.C.R. et al
Filing
40
ORDER DENYING Motion for Records 34 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/7/17. (Hellings, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
ERICK D. HENSON,
CASE NO. 1:16-cv-00471-LJO--MJS (PC)
10
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECORDS
11
v.
(ECF NO. 34)
12
CDCR, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
17
rights action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter proceeds on Plaintiff’s
18
Fourth Amendment claim against Defendant Dhillon.
19
20
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s December 19, 2016 motion for records. (ECF No.
34.) Defendant filed no response.
21
Plaintiff’s objective with this filing is unclear, but it appears he received copies of
22
subpoenas requiring the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to
23
produce documents relating to Plaintiff, and he wants to obtain a copy of these same
24
records.
25
Plaintiff presumably is able to access his own prison records and prison medical
26
files upon request. In any event, Defendant is not required to produce such documents
27
to Plaintiff, or to pay for copies of them, unless they are the subject of a properly
28
propounded request for production of documents. Plaintiff makes no showing that he has
1
tried unsuccessfully to review his own file or that he has propounded a request for
2
production of documents.
3
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for records is HEREBY DENIED.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
February 7, 2017
/s/
7
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?