J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Marini et al

Filing 6

ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 6/23/2016. Initial Scheduling Conference CONTINUED to 8/5/2016 at 08:45 AM in Bakersfield at 510 19th Street (JLT) before Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston. (Hall, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 J & J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. PATRICE M. MARINI, et al., Defendants. 15 16 17 ) Case No.: 1:16-cv-00477 AWI JLT ) ) ORDER CONTINUING SCHEDULING ) CONFERENCE ) ) ) ) ) ) On April 6, 2016, Plaintiff filed the instant action. (Doc. 1) On the same day, the Court issued 18 the summons (Doc. 2) and its order setting the mandatory scheduling conference to occur on June 16, 19 2015. (Doc. 3) In its order setting the mandatory scheduling conference, the Court advised counsel: 20 21 22 23 The Court is unable to conduct a scheduling conference until defendants have been served with the summons and complaint. Accordingly, plaintiff(s) shall diligently pursue service of summons and complaint and dismiss those defendants against whom plaintiff(s) will not pursue claims. Plaintiff(s) shall promptly file proofs of service of the summons and complaint so the Court has a record of service. Counsel are referred to F.R.Civ.P., Rule 4 regarding the requirement of timely service of the complaint. Failure to timely serve summons and complaint may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of unserved defendants. 24 25 (Doc. 3 at 1-2, emphasis added) Nevertheless, Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service of the 26 summons and complaint and no defendant has appeared in the action. Therefore, the Court ORDERS, 27 28 1. The scheduling conference, currently set on June 30, 2016, is continued to August 5, 2016 at 8:45 a.m. at the United States Courthouse at 510 19th Street, Bakersfield, CA. 1 Plaintiff is reminded of the service obligations under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4.1 Failure to comply 1 2 may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of unserved defendants. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: June 23, 2016 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) requires the Court sua sponte to dismiss defendants who have not been served within 90 days of the filing of the complaint unless good cause is shown. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?