Mugrauer et al v. Modesto et al
ORDER VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND SETTING DEADLINE FOR FILING ANY ADDITIONAL PAPERS, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 5/2/2017. (Kusamura, W)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PATRICIA MUGRAUER and WADE
CASE NO. 1:16-CV-0480 AWI SAB
ORDER VACATING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND SETTING DEADLINE
FOR FILING ANY ADDITIONAL
CITY OF MODESTO, et al.,
On January 19, 2017, the Court ordered the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff
Patricia Mugrauer and against the City of Modesto. See Doc. No. 24. The Court also provided a
briefing schedule for parties to follow if they could not reach agreement on the issue of attorneys’
fees and costs. See id. After extensions of time were granted, on April 28, 2017, Plaintiff’s
counsel submitted a notice of settlement with respect to the issue of attorneys’ fees and costs. See
Doc. No. 34. Because it appears that an agreement has been reached on the issue of attorneys’
fees and costs, the latest briefing schedule is now moot.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
The briefing schedule set on March 31, 2017 is VACATED in light of the notice of
Within fourteen days of service of this order, the parties shall submit any further
appropriate documents to the Court that may be necessary to effectuate full settlement of
Plaintiff Patricia Mugrauer’s claims;1 and
This case remains open and on-going with respect to the claims by Plaintiff Wade
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 2, 2017
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
The Court is unaware of the precise terms of the settlement, but judgment has already been entered in favor of
Patricia Mugrauer. If the parties believe that no further action by the Court is needed with respect to Patricia
Mugrauer claims, then the parties do not need to file any further papers with the Court. If the parties do not file any
other papers within the time specified in this order, the Court will view Patricia Mugrauer’s claims to be entirely
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?