Petillo v. Peterson et al

Filing 104

ORDERED that Defendant shall file a report detailing any impediments to payment and when the payment will be made; the obligation to report will continue until the payment has been made 101 ; ORDER DENYING 103 Motion to Reopen Case, signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/25/20. (14-Day Deadline) (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ISAIAH JOEL PETILLO, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 ORDER TO DEFENDANTS TO ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REOPEN CASE v. J.L. PETERSON, et al., 15 1:16-cv-00488-AWI-JLT (PC) Defendants. (Docs. 101, 103) FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 19 The Court held settlement conference in this action on March 6, 2019, following which the parties stipulated to the dismissal of the case. (See Docs. 98-100.) Plaintiff has since filed a motion for sanctions or to compel defendants to pay the amount owed him pursuant to the terms 20 of the settlement agreement. (Doc. 101.) In response, defendants note that the settlement 21 agreement anticipated that payment may take up to 180 days and that the settlement may be 22 subject to delays. (Doc. 102.) Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 23 1. Within 14 days and every 21 days thereafter, the Defendants SHALL file a report 24 detailing any impediments to payment and when the payment will be made. The 25 obligation to report will continue until the payment has been made; 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 2. The motion to reopen the case is DENIED. 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 25, 2020 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?