Estrada v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

AMENDED ORDER on Magistrate Judge's 11 Findings and Recommendations signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 08/05/2016. (Flores, E)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3
4

SYLVIA ESTRADA,

5

Plaintiff

6
7
8

AMENDED ORDER ON MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION

v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,

(Doc. No. 11)
Defendant

9
10

CASE NO. 1:16-CV-0497AWI SAB

Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security

11

denying certain disability benefits. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28

12

U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 302.

13

On June 29, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendation (“F&R”).

14

The F&R recommended dismissing this case without prejudice due to a failure to prosecute. The

15

F&R was served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the findings and

16

recommendations were to be filed within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the order. The

17

period for filing objections has now passed, and no objections have been filed.

18

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court has conducted a de

19

novo review. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including the objections, the Court finds

20

that the F&R is supported by the record and proper analysis. The F&R will be adopted in full.

21
22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the F&R issued June 29, 2016 (Doc. No.

23

11), is ADOPTED IN FULL and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to

24

prosecute.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 5, 2016
SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE