Thornton v. Grissom et al

Filing 57

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 44 Motion for Summary Judgment ORDER ADOPTING 47 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 10/25/2017. (Martin-Gill, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SIMON THORNTON, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. DONALD L. GRISSOM, et al., Defendants. CASE NO. 1:16-cv-0498-AWI-MJS (PC) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NOS. 44, 47) 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On July 21, 2017, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to 20 deny Plaintiff’s second motion for summary judgment because it was filed prematurely 21 and not in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and Local Rule 260(a). 22 (ECF No. 47.) Plaintiff has not filed any objections. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has 24 conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 25 Court finds the revised findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 26 by proper analysis. 27 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1 2 3 4 1. The Court adopts the July 21, 2017, findings and recommendations (ECF No. 47); and 2. Plaintiff’s June 26, 2017, motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 44) is DENIED without prejudice. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 25, 2017 SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?