Thornton v. Grissom et al

Filing 85

ORDER SETTING Briefing Schedule for Plaintiff's Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 6/7/2018. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 SIMON THORNTON, Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 D. GRISSOM, et al., 15 Case No. 1:16-cv-00498-LJO-JDP Defendants. ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL (Doc. No. 76) 16 17 Pro se plaintiff Simon Thornton is proceeding in this civil rights action under 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel responses to interrogatories. (Doc. No. 19 76.) Defendants have not filed a response. 20 The court will require a response to plaintiff’s motion. 21 Accordingly, 22 1. Defendants must file and serve their response to plaintiff’s motion to compel (Doc. 23 24 25 No. 76) within 14 days of the service of this order. 2. Plaintiff may file a reply in support of his motion within 14 days of the service of defendants’ response. 26 27 28 1 1 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 7, 2018 /s/ 4 Jeremy D. Peterson UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?