GSF Nut Company, LLC v. Hong Kong Bin Guo International Trading, Limited, et al

Filing 12

Second ex-parte request to Continue scheduling Conference and scheduling Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 11/09/2016. (Initial Scheduling Conference currently set for 12/8/2016 has been CONTINUED to 2/9/2017 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 6 (MJS) before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng.) (Dean, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Michael A. Dias, SBN 183705 Sarah M. Hacker, SBN 239338 DIAS LAW FIRM, INC. 502 West Grangeville Boulevard Hanford, California 93230 Telephone: (559) 585-7330 Facsimile: (559) 585-7335 Attorneys for Plaintiff: GSF NUT COMPANY, LLC 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) v. ) ) HONG KONG BIN GUO ) INTERNATIONAL TRADING LIMITED, a ) Chinese corporation; HEBEI YANG YUAN ) ZHI HUI YIN PIN GU FEN YOU XIAN ) GONG SI, a Chinese corporation, and ) DOES 1-50, (inclusively) ) ) ) Defendants. __________________________________) GSF NUT COMPANY, LLC, a California limited liability company, Case No. 1:16-CV-00501-LJO-MJS SECOND EX-PARTE REQUEST TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Jury Trial Demanded 19 To THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DEFENDANTS AND THEIR COUNSEL 20 OF RECORD: 21 Plaintiff GSF NUT COMPANY, LLC (“GSF”) requests that the Court finds good 22 cause to continue scheduling conference and extend the deadline to issue a scheduling 23 order pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. One defendant, 24 25 HONG KONG BIN GUO INTERNATIONAL TRADING LIMITED (“Hong Kong”) has been served. To GSF’s knowledge and belief, Hong Kong has not retained counsel. 26 Since the date of service, Hong Kong had been in direct contact with GSF to informally 27 to resolve the matter between GSF and Hong Kong without the costly expense of 28 counsel. Second Ex-Parte Request to Continue Scheduling Conference and Scheduling Order 1 Dias Law Firm, Inc. Michael A. Dias Jonette M. Montgomery John C. Umscheid Sarah M. Hacker Ella R. Floresca Jimmy J. Rodriguez Of Counsel Alicia D. Wrest Of Counsel 1 To date, GSF has not resolved its disputes with Hong Kong, and GSF will 2 pursue the lawsuit further with the all defendants. 3 service on HEBEI YANG YUAN ZHI HUI YIN PIN GU FEN YOU XIAN GONG SI 4 (“Hebei”). GSF will needs until February 2017 to serve Hebei and allow for Hebei to 5 answer. Neither Hong Kong nor Hebei has appeared in this matter. 6 7 GSF needs additional time for In order to continue serve attempts of Hebei, GSF requests this Court to find good cause and continue the deadline to file a Scheduling Order for February 9, 2017. 8 9 Dated: November 7, 2016 10 Respectfully Submitted, DIAS LAW FIRM, INC. 11 12 13 /s/ Michael A. Dias MICHAEL A. DIAS, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff GSF NUT COMPANY, LLC 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER For Good cause appearing, this Court grants Plaintiff GSF NUT COMPANY, LLC’s request in case number 1:16-cv-00501-LJO-MJS to continue the scheduling conference and extend the deadline for the Scheduling Conference until February 9, 2017 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Michael J. Seng 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: November 9, 2016 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 Dias Law Firm, Inc. Michael A. Dias Jonette M. Montgomery John C. Umscheid Sarah M. Hacker Ella R. Floresca Jimmy J. Rodriguez Of Counsel Alicia D. Wrest Of Counsel 28 Second Ex-Parte Request to Continue Scheduling Conference and Scheduling Order 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Dias Law Firm, Inc. Michael A. Dias Jonette M. Montgomery John C. Umscheid Sarah M. Hacker Ella R. Floresca Jimmy J. Rodriguez Of Counsel Alicia D. Wrest Of Counsel 28 Second Ex-Parte Request to Continue Scheduling Conference and Scheduling Order 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?