GSF Nut Company, LLC v. Hong Kong Bin Guo International Trading, Limited, et al
Filing
39
ORDER DENYING SECOND STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND RESPONSIVE PLEADING THERETO; signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 10/17/2017. (Bernacchi, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
GSF NUT COMPANY, LLC, a California
limited liability company,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
17
v.
Case No. 1:16-cv-00501-LJO-MJS
ORDER DENYING SECOND
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO FILE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND RESPONSIVE
PLEADING THERETO
HONG KONG BIN GUO INTERNATIONAL
TRADING LIMITED, a Chinese
corporation, HEBEI YANG YUAN ZHI HUI
YIN PIN GU FEN YOU XIAN GONG SI, a
Chinese corporation, and DOES 1 to 50,
(inclusively),
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
Plaintiff GSF Nut Company, LLC’s (“GSF”) and Defendant Hebei Yang Yuan Zhi
22
Hui Yin Pin Gu Fen You Xian Gong Si (“Hebei”) have asked the Court to approve their
23
Stipulation to extend until December 1, 2017 the time for GSF to file an amended
24
complaint and to December 29, 2017 the time for Hebei to file a responsive pleading to
25
the amended complaint.( ECF No. 38.)
26
The said Stipulation is rejected.
27
GSF shall have 10 days from the date of this Order to file the amended compliant
28
SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING
AN EXTENSION OF TIME
(CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00501-LJO-MJS)
OHSUSA:767433220.1
1
the parties have agreed may be filed, and Hebei shall have until November 27, 2017 to
2
file its response to the amended complaint.
3
This case has been pending since April 8, 2016. Hebei was served with GSF’s
4
Complaint (ECF No. 1) and the Court Summons (ECF No. 3) on July 19, 2017. There
5
have been multiple extensions of time in this case, several before Hebei was served
6
and some after. While the Court appreciates the unique circumstances which apparently
7
prompted early requests for extensions and certainly encourages the parties’ efforts to
8
resolve the case without further litigation, the case has been pending too long without
9
substantive development. It is time to move it along. Getting the pleadings at issue
10
11
should not substantively interfere with efforts to settle the case.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. GFS’s amended complaint must be filed and served within ten days of
12
the date of this Order; and,
13
2. Hebei shall have until November 27, 2017, to file a responsive pleading
14
to GSF’s amended complaint.
15
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
October 17, 2017
19
/s/
Michael J. Seng
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2OHSUSA:767433220.1
SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING
AN EXTENSION OF TIME
(CASE NO. 1:16-CV-00501-LJO-MJS)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?