Lucio v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
3
ORDER DENYING 2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 4/12/2016. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
ISABEL MARIA LUCIO,
Plaintiff,
11
12
Case No. 1:16-cv-00502-SMS
ORDER DENYING APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
v.
13
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner Of Social Security,
14
Defendant.
(Doc. 2)
15
16
By motion filed April 8, 2016, Plaintiff Isabel Maria Lucio, by her attorney, Young Chul
17
Cho, seeks to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff submitted an application which is incomplete.
18
On the application, Plaintiff was to provide information concerning any cash or checking or savings
19
accounts. Absent complete information regarding Plaintiff’s financial situation, the Court cannot
20
evaluate whether Plaintiff is sufficiently impoverished to justify proceeding without paying the filing
21
fee for her lawsuit.
22
Additionally, the Court notes that Plaintiff did not include the case number in the caption of
23
her application. If Plaintiff elects to submit an amended application, as this order permits her to do,
24
she must provide complete case information in the caption of the application.
25
Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff
26
shall either submit an amended and complete application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the
27
filing fee to the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of this order. If Plaintiff does not pay the
28
1
filing fee or submit an amended application, the Court shall dismiss the case for lack of prosecution
2
without further notice.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
April 12, 2016
/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?