Thomas v. Lewis et al
Filing
111
ORDER adopting FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and denying Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 97 signed by District Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/10/2019. (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHNNY C. THOMAS,
12
Plaintiff,
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
Defendant.
13
14
No. 1:16-cv-00524-DAD-EPG
(Doc. No. 97)
v.
MARK KUO,
15
16
17
Plaintiff, Johnny C. Thomas, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis
18
19
in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United
20
States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On June 5, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations,
21
22
recommending that plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and supplemental motion for
23
summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 68, 71) be denied, and that defendant’s cross-motion for summary
24
judgment (Doc. No. 70) also be denied. (Doc. No. 97.) The findings and recommendations were
25
served on the parties and contained notice that any objections were due within twenty-one (21)
26
days. (Id. at 22.) Neither party has filed any objections and the time to do so has now passed.
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
2
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
3
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
4
Accordingly,
5
1.
6
7
The findings and recommendations entered on June 5, 2019 (Doc. No. 97) are
adopted in full;
2.
8
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and supplemental motion for summary
judgment (Doc. Nos. 68, 71) are denied;
9
3.
Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 70) is denied; and
10
4.
This matter is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for further
11
12
13
14
proceedings consistent with this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 10, 2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?