Thomas v. Lewis et al
Filing
115
ORDER setting hearing on Plaintiff's MOTION to Hold Defendant in Contempt of Court 84 signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 7/25/2019. (Hearing set for 8/14/2019 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 10 (EPG) before Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean). (Lundstrom, T)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHNNY C. THOMAS,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:16-cv-00524-DAD-EPG
ORDER SETTING HEARING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO HOLD
DEFENDANT IN CONTEMPT OF COURT
v.
MARK KUO,
(ECF No. 84)
Defendant.
16
17
18
The Court sets a hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Order to Hold Defendant, Mark Kuo,
19 in Contempt (ECF No. 84) for August 14, 2019, at 3:00 p.m., in Courtroom 10 before
20 Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean. The parties shall be prepared to discuss Plaintiff’s claim
21 that Defendant has not disclosed all documents available to Defendant that are responsive to
22 Plaintiff’s May 22, 2018, Requests Number 3 and Number 4. Additionally, Defendant shall be
23 prepared to discuss what search was performed to locate all documents responsive to Plaintiff’s
24 May 22, 2018, Requests Number 3 and Number 4.
25
To appear telephonically, each party is to use the following dial-in number and
26 passcode: Dial-in number 1-888-251-2909; Passcode 1024453. Plaintiff shall make
27 arrangements with staff at his institution of confinement for his attendance at the hearing.
28 Plaintiff’s institution of confinement shall make Plaintiff available for the hearing at the date
1
1 and time indicated above. Prior to the hearing, defense counsel shall confirm with Plaintiff’s
2 institution of confinement that arrangements have been made for Plaintiff’s attendance.
3
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
July 25, 2019
/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?