Wilson v. Cambell et al

Filing 53

ORDER VACATING Discovery and Scheduling Order Pending Resolution of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment re 52 signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 2/5/2018. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 CHRISTOPHER WILSON, 6 Plaintiff, v. 7 8 Case No. 1:16-cv-00534-AWI-SKO (PC) ORDER VACATING THE DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER PENDING RESOLUTION OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CAMBELL, et al., (Doc. 52) Defendants. 9 10 11 Plaintiff, Christopher Wilson, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 12 in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Complaint (Doc. 1) has been 13 screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915A and found to state cognizable claims against Correctional 14 Officer T. Campbell and Correctional Officer Michelle Miller for excessive force in violation of 15 the Eighth Amendment -- upon which Plaintiff proceeds in this action. (Doc. 10). 16 On February 2, 2018, Defendants filed a motion seeking to vacate the Discovery and 17 Scheduling Order pending resolution of the motion for summary judgment they filed on 18 December 12, 2017. (Docs. 41, 52.) Good cause for the requested extension has been presented 19 and found. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to vacate the 20 dispositive motion filing deadline, filed on February 2, 2018 (Doc. 52), is GRANTED.1 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: February 5, 2018 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 24 25 26 27 28 1 If Defendant’s motion for summary judgment does not resolve this case in its entirety, new deadlines will be set. 1 .

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?