Houston Casualty Company v. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company et al

Filing 139

ORDER on stipulation regarding Crum and Forster's answer to plaintiff's first amended complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/7/2017. (Rooney, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

10 HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY,

Case No. 1:16-cv-00535-LJO-EPG

11

ORDER ON STIPULATION
REGARDING CRUM &
FORSTER’S ANSWER TO
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

12
13

Plaintiff,
v.

14 CHARTER OAK FIRE INSURANCE
COMPANY, et al.
15
16 Defendants.
17

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby

18 ORDERED that Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company’s Answer to Plaintiff
19 Houston Casualty Company’s Original Complaint [Doc. 29] is hereby deemed as
20 Crum and Forster’s Answer to Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint [Doc. 95].
21
22 IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
24

Dated:

March 7, 2017

/s/
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

25
26
27
28
-

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-